How Well Does Generative Recommendation Generalize?
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866908902687244288 |
|---|---|
| author | Ding, Yijie Guo, Zitian Li, Jiacheng Peng, Letian Shao, Shuai Shao, Wei Luo, Xiaoqiang Simon, Luke Shang, Jingbo McAuley, Julian Hou, Yupeng |
| author_facet | Ding, Yijie Guo, Zitian Li, Jiacheng Peng, Letian Shao, Shuai Shao, Wei Luo, Xiaoqiang Simon, Luke Shang, Jingbo McAuley, Julian Hou, Yupeng |
| contents | A widely held hypothesis for why generative recommendation (GR) models outperform conventional item ID-based models is that they generalize better. However, there is few systematic way to verify this hypothesis beyond a superficial comparison of overall performance. To address this gap, we categorize each data instance based on the specific capability required for a correct prediction: either memorization (reusing item transition patterns observed during training) or generalization (composing known patterns to predict unseen item transitions). Extensive experiments show that GR models perform better on instances that require generalization, whereas item ID-based models perform better when memorization is more important. To explain this divergence, we shift the analysis from the item level to the token level and show that what appears to be item-level generalization often reduces to token-level memorization for GR models. Finally, we show that the two paradigms are complementary. We propose a simple memorization-aware indicator that adaptively combines them on a per-instance basis, leading to improved overall recommendation performance. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_19809 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | How Well Does Generative Recommendation Generalize? Ding, Yijie Guo, Zitian Li, Jiacheng Peng, Letian Shao, Shuai Shao, Wei Luo, Xiaoqiang Simon, Luke Shang, Jingbo McAuley, Julian Hou, Yupeng Information Retrieval A widely held hypothesis for why generative recommendation (GR) models outperform conventional item ID-based models is that they generalize better. However, there is few systematic way to verify this hypothesis beyond a superficial comparison of overall performance. To address this gap, we categorize each data instance based on the specific capability required for a correct prediction: either memorization (reusing item transition patterns observed during training) or generalization (composing known patterns to predict unseen item transitions). Extensive experiments show that GR models perform better on instances that require generalization, whereas item ID-based models perform better when memorization is more important. To explain this divergence, we shift the analysis from the item level to the token level and show that what appears to be item-level generalization often reduces to token-level memorization for GR models. Finally, we show that the two paradigms are complementary. We propose a simple memorization-aware indicator that adaptively combines them on a per-instance basis, leading to improved overall recommendation performance. |
| title | How Well Does Generative Recommendation Generalize? |
| topic | Information Retrieval |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19809 |