Is It a Good Idea to Build an HLS Tool on Top of MLIR? Experience from Building the Dynamatic HLS Compiler
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915877512806400 |
|---|---|
| author | Xu, Jiahui Murphy, Emmet Josipovic, Lana |
| author_facet | Xu, Jiahui Murphy, Emmet Josipovic, Lana |
| contents | When the MLIR project was first introduced, it promised to address the issues that the HLS community had with the LLVM project. But is this really the case, and is MLIR the "right"/"best" compiler infrastructure for HLS? We here share our experiences based on the development of Dynamatic (github.com/EPFL-LAP/dynamatic). |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_19856 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Is It a Good Idea to Build an HLS Tool on Top of MLIR? Experience from Building the Dynamatic HLS Compiler Xu, Jiahui Murphy, Emmet Josipovic, Lana Programming Languages When the MLIR project was first introduced, it promised to address the issues that the HLS community had with the LLVM project. But is this really the case, and is MLIR the "right"/"best" compiler infrastructure for HLS? We here share our experiences based on the development of Dynamatic (github.com/EPFL-LAP/dynamatic). |
| title | Is It a Good Idea to Build an HLS Tool on Top of MLIR? Experience from Building the Dynamatic HLS Compiler |
| topic | Programming Languages |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19856 |