Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19921 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910061301858304 |
|---|---|
| author | Perrella, Stefano Agostinho, Eric Morales Zaragoza, Hugo |
| author_facet | Perrella, Stefano Agostinho, Eric Morales Zaragoza, Hugo |
| contents | Machine Translation (MT) and automatic MT evaluation have improved dramatically in recent years, enabling numerous novel applications. Automatic evaluation techniques have evolved from producing scalar quality scores to precisely locating translation errors and assigning them error categories and severity levels. However, it remains unclear how to reliably measure the evaluation capabilities of auto-evaluators that do error detection, as no established technique exists in the literature. This work investigates different implementations of span-level precision, recall, and F-score, showing that seemingly similar approaches can yield substantially different rankings, and that certain widely-used techniques are unsuitable for evaluating MT error detection. We propose "match with partial overlap and partial credit" (MPP) with micro-averaging as a robust meta-evaluation strategy and release code for its use publicly. Finally, we use MPP to assess the state of the art in MT error detection. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_19921 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Span-Level Machine Translation Meta-Evaluation Perrella, Stefano Agostinho, Eric Morales Zaragoza, Hugo Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Machine Translation (MT) and automatic MT evaluation have improved dramatically in recent years, enabling numerous novel applications. Automatic evaluation techniques have evolved from producing scalar quality scores to precisely locating translation errors and assigning them error categories and severity levels. However, it remains unclear how to reliably measure the evaluation capabilities of auto-evaluators that do error detection, as no established technique exists in the literature. This work investigates different implementations of span-level precision, recall, and F-score, showing that seemingly similar approaches can yield substantially different rankings, and that certain widely-used techniques are unsuitable for evaluating MT error detection. We propose "match with partial overlap and partial credit" (MPP) with micro-averaging as a robust meta-evaluation strategy and release code for its use publicly. Finally, we use MPP to assess the state of the art in MT error detection. |
| title | Span-Level Machine Translation Meta-Evaluation |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19921 |