Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang, Jingwei, Nezafati, Kuroush, Chi, Zhikai, Rong, Ruichen, Treager, Colin, Wanyan, Tingyi, Xu, Yueshuang, Zhan, Xiaowei, Leavey, Patrick, Xiao, Guanghua, Shi, Wenqi, Xie, Yang
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20435
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915942812876800
author Huang, Jingwei
Nezafati, Kuroush
Chi, Zhikai
Rong, Ruichen
Treager, Colin
Wanyan, Tingyi
Xu, Yueshuang
Zhan, Xiaowei
Leavey, Patrick
Xiao, Guanghua
Shi, Wenqi
Xie, Yang
author_facet Huang, Jingwei
Nezafati, Kuroush
Chi, Zhikai
Rong, Ruichen
Treager, Colin
Wanyan, Tingyi
Xu, Yueshuang
Zhan, Xiaowei
Leavey, Patrick
Xiao, Guanghua
Shi, Wenqi
Xie, Yang
contents Extracting structured information from clinical notes requires navigating a dense web of interdependent variables where the value of one attribute logically constrains others. Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based extraction pipelines often struggle to capture these dependencies, leading to clinically inconsistent outputs. We propose deep reflective reasoning, a large language model agent framework that iteratively self-critiques and revises structured outputs by checking consistency among variables, the input text, and retrieved domain knowledge, stopping when outputs converge. We extensively evaluate the proposed method in three diverse oncology applications: (1) On colorectal cancer synoptic reporting from gross descriptions (n=217), reflective reasoning improved average F1 across eight categorical synoptic variables from 0.828 to 0.911 and increased mean correct rate across four numeric variables from 0.806 to 0.895; (2) On Ewing sarcoma CD99 immunostaining pattern identification (n=200), the accuracy improved from 0.870 to 0.927; (3) On lung cancer tumor staging (n=100), tumor stage accuracy improved from 0.680 to 0.833 (pT: 0.842 -> 0.884; pN: 0.885 -> 0.948). The results demonstrate that deep reflective reasoning can systematically improve the reliability of LLM-based structured data extraction under interdependence constraints, enabling more consistent machine-operable clinical datasets and facilitating knowledge discovery with machine learning and data science towards digital health.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_20435
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Deep reflective reasoning in interdependence constrained structured data extraction from clinical notes for digital health
Huang, Jingwei
Nezafati, Kuroush
Chi, Zhikai
Rong, Ruichen
Treager, Colin
Wanyan, Tingyi
Xu, Yueshuang
Zhan, Xiaowei
Leavey, Patrick
Xiao, Guanghua
Shi, Wenqi
Xie, Yang
Artificial Intelligence
Extracting structured information from clinical notes requires navigating a dense web of interdependent variables where the value of one attribute logically constrains others. Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based extraction pipelines often struggle to capture these dependencies, leading to clinically inconsistent outputs. We propose deep reflective reasoning, a large language model agent framework that iteratively self-critiques and revises structured outputs by checking consistency among variables, the input text, and retrieved domain knowledge, stopping when outputs converge. We extensively evaluate the proposed method in three diverse oncology applications: (1) On colorectal cancer synoptic reporting from gross descriptions (n=217), reflective reasoning improved average F1 across eight categorical synoptic variables from 0.828 to 0.911 and increased mean correct rate across four numeric variables from 0.806 to 0.895; (2) On Ewing sarcoma CD99 immunostaining pattern identification (n=200), the accuracy improved from 0.870 to 0.927; (3) On lung cancer tumor staging (n=100), tumor stage accuracy improved from 0.680 to 0.833 (pT: 0.842 -> 0.884; pN: 0.885 -> 0.948). The results demonstrate that deep reflective reasoning can systematically improve the reliability of LLM-based structured data extraction under interdependence constraints, enabling more consistent machine-operable clinical datasets and facilitating knowledge discovery with machine learning and data science towards digital health.
title Deep reflective reasoning in interdependence constrained structured data extraction from clinical notes for digital health
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20435