Physics-Informed Graph Neural Jump ODEs for Cascading Failure Prediction in Power Grids

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Sevak, Birva, Jadhav, Shrenik, Bui, Van-Hai
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866910062577975296
author Sevak, Birva
Jadhav, Shrenik
Bui, Van-Hai
author_facet Sevak, Birva
Jadhav, Shrenik
Bui, Van-Hai
contents Cascading failures in power grids pose severe risks to infrastructure reliability, yet real-time prediction of their progression remains an open challenge. Physics-based simulators require minutes to hours per scenario, while existing graph neural network approaches treat cascading failures as static classification tasks, ignoring temporal evolution and physical laws. This paper proposes Physics-Informed Graph Neural Jump ODEs (PI-GN-JODE), combining an edge-conditioned graph neural network encoder, a Neural ODE for continuous power redistribution, a jump process handler for discrete relay trips, and Kirchhoff-based physics regularization. The model simultaneously predicts edge and node failure probabilities, severity classification, and demand not served, while an autoregressive extension enables round-by-round temporal cascade prediction. Evaluated on the IEEE 24-bus and 118-bus systems with 20,000 scenarios each, PI-GN-JODE achieves a Precision--Recall Area Under the Curve of 0.991 for edge failure detection, 0.973 for node failure detection, and a coefficient of determination of 0.951 for demand-not-served regression on the 118-bus system, outperforming a standard graph convolutional network baseline (0.948, 0.925, and 0.912, respectively). Ablation studies reveal that the four components function synergistically, with the physics-informed loss alone contributing +9.2 points to demand-not-served regression. Performance improves when scaling to larger grids, and the architecture achieves the highest balanced accuracy (0.996) on the PowerGraph benchmark using data from a different simulation framework.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_20838
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Physics-Informed Graph Neural Jump ODEs for Cascading Failure Prediction in Power Grids
Sevak, Birva
Jadhav, Shrenik
Bui, Van-Hai
Systems and Control
Cascading failures in power grids pose severe risks to infrastructure reliability, yet real-time prediction of their progression remains an open challenge. Physics-based simulators require minutes to hours per scenario, while existing graph neural network approaches treat cascading failures as static classification tasks, ignoring temporal evolution and physical laws. This paper proposes Physics-Informed Graph Neural Jump ODEs (PI-GN-JODE), combining an edge-conditioned graph neural network encoder, a Neural ODE for continuous power redistribution, a jump process handler for discrete relay trips, and Kirchhoff-based physics regularization. The model simultaneously predicts edge and node failure probabilities, severity classification, and demand not served, while an autoregressive extension enables round-by-round temporal cascade prediction. Evaluated on the IEEE 24-bus and 118-bus systems with 20,000 scenarios each, PI-GN-JODE achieves a Precision--Recall Area Under the Curve of 0.991 for edge failure detection, 0.973 for node failure detection, and a coefficient of determination of 0.951 for demand-not-served regression on the 118-bus system, outperforming a standard graph convolutional network baseline (0.948, 0.925, and 0.912, respectively). Ablation studies reveal that the four components function synergistically, with the physics-informed loss alone contributing +9.2 points to demand-not-served regression. Performance improves when scaling to larger grids, and the architecture achieves the highest balanced accuracy (0.996) on the PowerGraph benchmark using data from a different simulation framework.
title Physics-Informed Graph Neural Jump ODEs for Cascading Failure Prediction in Power Grids
topic Systems and Control
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20838