Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21770 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866915890651463680 |
|---|---|
| author | Armato, Antonino Kehl, Christian Fischer, Sebastian |
| author_facet | Armato, Antonino Kehl, Christian Fischer, Sebastian |
| contents | Accurate and reliable safety metrics are paramount for functional safety verification of ASICs in automotive systems. Traditional FMEDA (Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis) metrics, such as SPFM (Single Point Fault Metric) and LFM (Latent Fault Metric), depend on the precision of failure mode distribution (FMD) and diagnostic coverage (DC) estimations. This reliance can often leads to significant, unquantified uncertainties and a dependency on expert judgment, compromising the quality of the safety analysis. This paper proposes a novel approach that introduces error propagation theory into the calculation of FMEDA safety metrics. By quantifying the maximum deviation and providing confidence intervals for SPFM and LFM, our method offers a direct measure of analysis quality. Furthermore, we introduce an Error Importance Identifier (EII) to pinpoint the primary sources of uncertainty, guiding targeted improvements. This approach significantly enhances the transparency and trustworthiness of FMEDA, enabling more robust ASIC safety verification for ISO 26262 compliance, addressing a longstanding open question in the functional safety community. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_21770 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Quantifying Uncertainty in FMEDA Safety Metrics: An Error Propagation Approach for Enhanced ASIC Verification Armato, Antonino Kehl, Christian Fischer, Sebastian Hardware Architecture Software Engineering Accurate and reliable safety metrics are paramount for functional safety verification of ASICs in automotive systems. Traditional FMEDA (Failure Modes, Effects, and Diagnostic Analysis) metrics, such as SPFM (Single Point Fault Metric) and LFM (Latent Fault Metric), depend on the precision of failure mode distribution (FMD) and diagnostic coverage (DC) estimations. This reliance can often leads to significant, unquantified uncertainties and a dependency on expert judgment, compromising the quality of the safety analysis. This paper proposes a novel approach that introduces error propagation theory into the calculation of FMEDA safety metrics. By quantifying the maximum deviation and providing confidence intervals for SPFM and LFM, our method offers a direct measure of analysis quality. Furthermore, we introduce an Error Importance Identifier (EII) to pinpoint the primary sources of uncertainty, guiding targeted improvements. This approach significantly enhances the transparency and trustworthiness of FMEDA, enabling more robust ASIC safety verification for ISO 26262 compliance, addressing a longstanding open question in the functional safety community. |
| title | Quantifying Uncertainty in FMEDA Safety Metrics: An Error Propagation Approach for Enhanced ASIC Verification |
| topic | Hardware Architecture Software Engineering |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21770 |