Calibeating Made Simple

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yurong, Huang, Zhiyi, Jordan, Michael I., Luo, Haipeng
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866910066196611072
author Chen, Yurong
Huang, Zhiyi
Jordan, Michael I.
Luo, Haipeng
author_facet Chen, Yurong
Huang, Zhiyi
Jordan, Michael I.
Luo, Haipeng
contents We study calibeating, the problem of post-processing external forecasts online to minimize cumulative losses and match an informativeness-based benchmark. Unlike prior work, which analyzed calibeating for specific losses with specific arguments, we reduce calibeating to existing online learning techniques and obtain results for general proper losses. More concretely, we first show that calibeating is minimax-equivalent to regret minimization. This recovers the $O(\log T)$ calibeating rate of Foster and Hart [FH23] for the Brier and log losses and its optimality, and yields new optimal calibeating rates for mixable losses and general bounded losses. Second, we prove that multi-calibeating is minimax-equivalent to the combination of calibeating and the classical expert problem. This yields new optimal multi-calibeating rates for mixable losses, including Brier and log losses, and general bounded losses. Finally, we obtain new bounds for achieving calibeating and calibration simultaneously for the Brier loss. For binary predictions, our result gives the first calibrated algorithm that at the same time also achieves the optimal $O(\log T)$ calibeating rate.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_22167
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Calibeating Made Simple
Chen, Yurong
Huang, Zhiyi
Jordan, Michael I.
Luo, Haipeng
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science and Game Theory
Theoretical Economics
We study calibeating, the problem of post-processing external forecasts online to minimize cumulative losses and match an informativeness-based benchmark. Unlike prior work, which analyzed calibeating for specific losses with specific arguments, we reduce calibeating to existing online learning techniques and obtain results for general proper losses. More concretely, we first show that calibeating is minimax-equivalent to regret minimization. This recovers the $O(\log T)$ calibeating rate of Foster and Hart [FH23] for the Brier and log losses and its optimality, and yields new optimal calibeating rates for mixable losses and general bounded losses. Second, we prove that multi-calibeating is minimax-equivalent to the combination of calibeating and the classical expert problem. This yields new optimal multi-calibeating rates for mixable losses, including Brier and log losses, and general bounded losses. Finally, we obtain new bounds for achieving calibeating and calibration simultaneously for the Brier loss. For binary predictions, our result gives the first calibrated algorithm that at the same time also achieves the optimal $O(\log T)$ calibeating rate.
title Calibeating Made Simple
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science and Game Theory
Theoretical Economics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22167