Design Implications for Student and Educator Needs in AI-Supported Programming Learning Tools
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910068034764800 |
|---|---|
| author | Ma, Boxuan Xie, Yinjie Li, Huiyong Li, Gen Chen, Li Shimada, Atsushi Konomi, Shin'Ichi |
| author_facet | Ma, Boxuan Xie, Yinjie Li, Huiyong Li, Gen Chen, Li Shimada, Atsushi Konomi, Shin'Ichi |
| contents | AI-powered coding assistants can support students in programming courses by providing on-demand explanations and debugging help. However, existing research often focuses on individual tools, leaving a gap in evidence-based design recommendations that reflect both educator and student perspectives in education settings. To ground the design of learning-oriented AI coding assistants for both sides' needs, we conducted parallel surveys of educators (N=50) and students (N=90) to compare preferences about (i) how students should request help, (ii) how AI should respond, and (iii) who should control. Our results show that educators generally favored indirect scaffolding that preserves students' reasoning, whereas students were more likely to prefer direct, actionable help. Educators further highlighted the need for course-aligned constraints and instructor-facing oversight, while students emphasized timely support and clarity when stuck. Based on these findings, we discuss the interaction-focused design space and derive design implications for learning-oriented AI coding assistants, highlighting scaffolding and control mechanisms that balance students' agency with instructional constraints. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_22673 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Design Implications for Student and Educator Needs in AI-Supported Programming Learning Tools Ma, Boxuan Xie, Yinjie Li, Huiyong Li, Gen Chen, Li Shimada, Atsushi Konomi, Shin'Ichi Human-Computer Interaction AI-powered coding assistants can support students in programming courses by providing on-demand explanations and debugging help. However, existing research often focuses on individual tools, leaving a gap in evidence-based design recommendations that reflect both educator and student perspectives in education settings. To ground the design of learning-oriented AI coding assistants for both sides' needs, we conducted parallel surveys of educators (N=50) and students (N=90) to compare preferences about (i) how students should request help, (ii) how AI should respond, and (iii) who should control. Our results show that educators generally favored indirect scaffolding that preserves students' reasoning, whereas students were more likely to prefer direct, actionable help. Educators further highlighted the need for course-aligned constraints and instructor-facing oversight, while students emphasized timely support and clarity when stuck. Based on these findings, we discuss the interaction-focused design space and derive design implications for learning-oriented AI coding assistants, highlighting scaffolding and control mechanisms that balance students' agency with instructional constraints. |
| title | Design Implications for Student and Educator Needs in AI-Supported Programming Learning Tools |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22673 |