Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22934 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910081467023360 |
|---|---|
| author | Yin, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Cheng, Chih-Hong |
| author_facet | Yin, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Cheng, Chih-Hong |
| contents | Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the reliability of large language model applications by grounding generation in retrieved evidence, but it also introduces a new attack surface: corpus poisoning. In this setting, an adversary injects or edits passages so that they are ranked into the Top-$K$ results for target queries and then affect downstream generation. Existing defences against corpus poisoning often rely on content filtering, auxiliary models, or generator-side reasoning, which can make deployment more difficult. We propose ProGRank, a post hoc, training-free retriever-side defence for dense-retriever RAG. ProGRank stress-tests each query--passage pair under mild randomized perturbations and extracts probe gradients from a small fixed parameter subset of the retriever. From these signals, it derives two instability signals, representational consistency and dispersion risk, and combines them with a score gate in a reranking step. ProGRank preserves the original passage content, requires no retraining, and also supports a surrogate-based variant when the deployed retriever is unavailable. Extensive experiments across three datasets, three dense retriever backbones, representative corpus poisoning attacks, and both retrieval-stage and end-to-end settings show that ProGRank provides stronger defence performance and a favorable robustness--utility trade-off. It also remains competitive under adaptive evasive attacks. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_22934 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | ProGRank: Probe-Gradient Reranking to Defend Dense-Retriever RAG from Corpus Poisoning Yin, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Cheng, Chih-Hong Artificial Intelligence Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the reliability of large language model applications by grounding generation in retrieved evidence, but it also introduces a new attack surface: corpus poisoning. In this setting, an adversary injects or edits passages so that they are ranked into the Top-$K$ results for target queries and then affect downstream generation. Existing defences against corpus poisoning often rely on content filtering, auxiliary models, or generator-side reasoning, which can make deployment more difficult. We propose ProGRank, a post hoc, training-free retriever-side defence for dense-retriever RAG. ProGRank stress-tests each query--passage pair under mild randomized perturbations and extracts probe gradients from a small fixed parameter subset of the retriever. From these signals, it derives two instability signals, representational consistency and dispersion risk, and combines them with a score gate in a reranking step. ProGRank preserves the original passage content, requires no retraining, and also supports a surrogate-based variant when the deployed retriever is unavailable. Extensive experiments across three datasets, three dense retriever backbones, representative corpus poisoning attacks, and both retrieval-stage and end-to-end settings show that ProGRank provides stronger defence performance and a favorable robustness--utility trade-off. It also remains competitive under adaptive evasive attacks. |
| title | ProGRank: Probe-Gradient Reranking to Defend Dense-Retriever RAG from Corpus Poisoning |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22934 |