IXPE view of the Crab pulsar following the 17 July and 6 August 2025 glitches

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soffitta, Paolo, Bucciantini, Niccolò, Wong, Josephine, Caniulef, Denis Gonzalez, Bachetti, Matteo, Ferrazzoli, Riccardo, Xie, Fei, Costa, Enrico, Pilia, Maura, Cibrario, Nicolò, Dinsmore, Jack T., Di Lalla, Niccolò, Kaaret, Philip, Liu, Kuan, Mizuno, Tsunefumi, Negro, Michela, Ng, C. -Y., Omodei, Nicola, Pagliarella, Simone, Silvestri, Stefano, Yang, Yi-Jung, Weisskopf, Martin C.
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866915891521781760
author Soffitta, Paolo
Bucciantini, Niccolò
Wong, Josephine
Caniulef, Denis Gonzalez
Bachetti, Matteo
Ferrazzoli, Riccardo
Xie, Fei
Costa, Enrico
Pilia, Maura
Cibrario, Nicolò
Dinsmore, Jack T.
Di Lalla, Niccolò
Kaaret, Philip
Liu, Kuan
Mizuno, Tsunefumi
Negro, Michela
Ng, C. -Y.
Omodei, Nicola
Pagliarella, Simone
Silvestri, Stefano
Yang, Yi-Jung
Weisskopf, Martin C.
author_facet Soffitta, Paolo
Bucciantini, Niccolò
Wong, Josephine
Caniulef, Denis Gonzalez
Bachetti, Matteo
Ferrazzoli, Riccardo
Xie, Fei
Costa, Enrico
Pilia, Maura
Cibrario, Nicolò
Dinsmore, Jack T.
Di Lalla, Niccolò
Kaaret, Philip
Liu, Kuan
Mizuno, Tsunefumi
Negro, Michela
Ng, C. -Y.
Omodei, Nicola
Pagliarella, Simone
Silvestri, Stefano
Yang, Yi-Jung
Weisskopf, Martin C.
contents The Crab pulsar experienced two relatively small glitches separated by only 20 days in September and October 2025. IXPE observed the source twice, with delay times since the glitch epoch ranging between 35 and 75 days, depending on the observation. We carried out a multi-method analysis to investigate whether there is evidence for significant changes in the polarization properties of the pulsar, underlying possible variations in the pulsar magnetosphere itself following the glitches. Specifically, we performed: (1) phase-averaged polarimetry of the Crab pulsar before and after the glitches, following an approach similar to that adopted in 2019 by PolarLight, a non-imaging CubeSat-class photoelectric polarimeter which observed a change in the X-ray polarization within 100 days after a stronger glitch in July 2019; (2) a comparison, before and after the glitch, of phase-resolved X-ray polarimetry with IXPE, not possible with PolarLight. Furthermore, we investigated, by means of phase-resolved optical (OPTIMA) polarimetry, whether a significant change in the X-to-optical lag was present in the data before and after the glitch. We find no evidence of a change in the polarization for the pulsar emission before and after the glitch, We use the upper limits obtained to estimate the maximum change in magnetic obliquity allowed by the data, using the standard rotating vector model and assuming that the glitch is due to a neutron-star quake. We constrain this maximum change to be no greater than $\pm4^{o}$ at the 95\% confidence level.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_23808
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle IXPE view of the Crab pulsar following the 17 July and 6 August 2025 glitches
Soffitta, Paolo
Bucciantini, Niccolò
Wong, Josephine
Caniulef, Denis Gonzalez
Bachetti, Matteo
Ferrazzoli, Riccardo
Xie, Fei
Costa, Enrico
Pilia, Maura
Cibrario, Nicolò
Dinsmore, Jack T.
Di Lalla, Niccolò
Kaaret, Philip
Liu, Kuan
Mizuno, Tsunefumi
Negro, Michela
Ng, C. -Y.
Omodei, Nicola
Pagliarella, Simone
Silvestri, Stefano
Yang, Yi-Jung
Weisskopf, Martin C.
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
The Crab pulsar experienced two relatively small glitches separated by only 20 days in September and October 2025. IXPE observed the source twice, with delay times since the glitch epoch ranging between 35 and 75 days, depending on the observation. We carried out a multi-method analysis to investigate whether there is evidence for significant changes in the polarization properties of the pulsar, underlying possible variations in the pulsar magnetosphere itself following the glitches. Specifically, we performed: (1) phase-averaged polarimetry of the Crab pulsar before and after the glitches, following an approach similar to that adopted in 2019 by PolarLight, a non-imaging CubeSat-class photoelectric polarimeter which observed a change in the X-ray polarization within 100 days after a stronger glitch in July 2019; (2) a comparison, before and after the glitch, of phase-resolved X-ray polarimetry with IXPE, not possible with PolarLight. Furthermore, we investigated, by means of phase-resolved optical (OPTIMA) polarimetry, whether a significant change in the X-to-optical lag was present in the data before and after the glitch. We find no evidence of a change in the polarization for the pulsar emission before and after the glitch, We use the upper limits obtained to estimate the maximum change in magnetic obliquity allowed by the data, using the standard rotating vector model and assuming that the glitch is due to a neutron-star quake. We constrain this maximum change to be no greater than $\pm4^{o}$ at the 95\% confidence level.
title IXPE view of the Crab pulsar following the 17 July and 6 August 2025 glitches
topic High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23808