Copertina

The enrichment paradox: critical capability thresholds and irreversible dependency in human-AI symbiosis

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Park, Jeongju, Kim, Musu, Han, Sekyung
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2026
Soggetti:	Computers and Society
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

Battery health reporting fails independent validation across manufacturers
di: Park, Jeongju, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Sovereignty in the digital era: the quest for continuous access to dependable technological capabilities
di: Baldoni, Roberto, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Risk thresholds for frontier AI
di: Koessler, Leonie, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Can the capability of Large Language Models be described by human ability? A Meta Study
di: Zan, Mingrui, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Simpson's paradox explains the ubiquity of nonlinear, threshold, and complex contagions
di: Hébert-Dufresne, Laurent, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Evaluating AI capabilities in detecting conspiracy theories on YouTube
di: La Rocca, Leonardo, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

A framework for expected capability sets
di: Fayard, Nicolas, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

From experimentation to engagement: on the paradox of participatory AI and power in contexts of forced displacement and humanitarian crises
di: Suge, Stella, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

AI Act and Large Language Models (LLMs): When critical issues and privacy impact require human and ethical oversight
di: Fabiano, Nicola
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Finding critical transitions of the post-disaster recovery using the sensitivity analysis of agent-based models
di: Park, Sangung, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Biased AI improves human decision-making but reduces trust
di: Lai, Shiyang, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Designing escalation criteria for international AI incident response: criteria, triggers, and thresholds
di: Gomez, Francesca, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Modes of Analyzing Disinformation Narratives With AI/ML/Text Mining to Assist in Mitigating the Weaponization of Social Media
di: Skumanich, Andy, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Quantifying detection rates for dangerous capabilities: a theoretical model of dangerous capability evaluations
di: Bova, Paolo, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

What is the role of human decisions in a world of artificial intelligence: an economic evaluation of human-AI collaboration in diabetic retinopathy screening
di: Wang, Yueye, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

AI as IA: The use and abuse of artificial intelligence (AI) for human enhancement through intellectual augmentation (IA)
di: Erler, Alexandre, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Cognitive offloading and the speedup illusion in human-AI interaction
di: Yu, Sunny, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Rethinking Test-Time Scaling for Medical AI: Model and Task-Aware Strategies for LLMs and VLMs
di: Oh, Gyutaek, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Insightful analysis of historical sources at scales beyond human capabilities using unsupervised Machine Learning and XAI
di: Eberle, Oliver, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Do AI tutors empower or enslave learners? Toward a critical use of AI in education
di: Favero, Lucile, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

AI Civilization and the Transformation of Work
di: Han, Dongsoo
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Recurrent visitations expose the paradox of human mobility in the 15-Minute City vision
di: Zhang, Xiuning, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Towards responsible AI for education: Hybrid human-AI to confront the Elephant in the room
di: Hooshyar, Danial, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Acceptance of cybernetic avatars for capability enhancement: a large-scale survey
di: Aymerich-Franch, Laura, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Cognitive AI framework 2.0: advances in the simulation of human thought
di: Salas-Guerra, Rommel
Pubblicazione: (2025)

GeoSEE: Regional Socio-Economic Estimation With a Large Language Model
di: Han, Sungwon, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Digital capabilities assessment for supporting the transformation of the customer experience
di: Leonardo, Munoz, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Learning thresholds lead to stable language coexistence
di: Tamm, Mikhail V., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

AI's assigned gender affects human-AI cooperation
di: Bazazi, Sepideh, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Measuring Interest Group Positions on Legislation: An AI-Driven Analysis of Lobbying Reports
di: Kim, Jiseon, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

The direct democracy paradox: Microtargeting and issue ownership in Swiss online political ads
di: Capozzi, Arthur
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Position: Adopting AI in Practice Does Not Guarantee the Productivity Boost
di: Cho, Won Ik, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

AI reasoning effort predicts human decision time in content moderation
di: Davidson, Thomas
Pubblicazione: (2025)

What's it like to be a chat? On the co-simulation of artificial minds in human-AI conversations
di: Keeling, Geoff, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

What AI Speaks for Your Community: Polling AI Agents for Public Opinion on Data Center Projects
di: Wu, Zhifeng, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

ChatGPT as a mapping assistant: A novel method to enrich maps with generative AI and content derived from street-level photographs
di: Juhász, Levente, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Incentives shape how humans co-create with generative AI
di: Jo, Nathanael, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

AI-Augmented Peer Review and Scientific Productivity: A Cross-Country Panel and SEM Analysis
di: Han, Dongsoo
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Humans learn to prefer trustworthy AI over human partners
di: Jiang, Yaomin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Towards interactive evaluations for interaction harms in human-AI systems
di: Ibrahim, Lujain, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)