Copertina

Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Khatri, Jyotsana, Patwardhan, Manasi
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2026
Soggetti:	Artificial Intelligence
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation
di: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process
di: Kargaran, Amir Hossein, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
di: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

ResearchGym: Evaluating Language Model Agents on Real-World AI Research
di: Garikaparthi, Aniketh, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance
di: Ma, Qianli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

ResearchCodeAgent: An LLM Multi-Agent System for Automated Codification of Research Methodologies
di: Gandhi, Shubham, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Teaching Language Models to Forecast Research Success Through Comparative Idea Evaluation
di: Mule, Srujan P, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Acceleron: A Tool to Accelerate Research Ideation
di: Nigam, Harshit, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussions
di: Zhang, Daoze, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind
di: He, Zhitao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

REVERE: Reflective Evolving Research Engineer for Scientific Workflows
di: Gangireddi, Balaji Dinesh, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Thought-For-Food: Reasoning Chain Induced Food Visual Question Answering
di: Jain, Riddhi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

IRIS: Interactive Research Ideation System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery
di: Garikaparthi, Aniketh, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation
di: Baumann, Joachim, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

BudgetMLAgent: A Cost-Effective LLM Multi-Agent system for Automating Machine Learning Tasks
di: Gandhi, Shubham, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Privacy Preserving Ordinal-Meta Learning with VLMs for Fine-Grained Fruit Quality Prediction
di: Jain, Riddhi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
di: Kim, Jaeho, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

MIR: Methodology Inspiration Retrieval for Scientific Research Problems
di: Garikaparthi, Aniketh, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Automated Consistency Analysis of LLMs
di: Patwardhan, Aditya, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors
di: Sadallah, Abdelrahman, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

PeerArg: Argumentative Peer Review with LLMs
di: Sukpanichnant, Purin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

ScholarPeer: A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Peer Review
di: Goyal, Palash, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

REMOR: Automated Peer Review Generation with LLM Reasoning and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
di: Taechoyotin, Pawin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

AMIR: Automated MisInformation Rebuttal -- A COVID-19 Vaccination Datasets based Recommendation System
di: Sharma, Shakshi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

SciMDR: Advancing Scientific Multimodal Document Reasoning
di: Chen, Ziyu, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

REM-CTX: Automated Peer Review via Reinforcement Learning with Auxiliary Context
di: Taechoyotin, Pawin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

AbGen: Evaluating Large Language Models in Ablation Study Design and Evaluation for Scientific Research
di: Zhao, Yilun, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Adaptive Guidance Accelerates Reinforcement Learning of Reasoning Models
di: Nath, Vaskar, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Feedback Indices to Evaluate LLM Responses to Rebuttals for Multiple Choice Type Questions
di: Dunlap, Justin C., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks
di: Lin, Tzu-Ling, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

PeerGuard: Defending Multi-Agent Systems Against Backdoor Attacks Through Mutual Reasoning
di: Fan, Falong, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?
di: Church, Kenneth, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

PatRe: A Full-Stage Office Action and Rebuttal Generation Benchmark for Patent Examination
di: Wang, Qiyao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models
di: Akella, Akhil Pandey, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Prefix Guidance: A Steering Wheel for Large Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks
di: Zhao, Jiawei, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Routing End User Queries to Enterprise Databases
di: Sudarshan, Saikrishna, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot
di: Biswas, Joydeep, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

A Minimal Agent for Automated Theorem Proving
di: Requena, Borja, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Preventing the Collapse of Peer Review Requires Verification-First AI
di: You, Lei, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

PeerRank: Autonomous LLM Evaluation Through Web-Grounded, Bias-Controlled Peer Review
di: Margalit, Yanki, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)