Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27508 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866917365895135232 |
|---|---|
| author | Xue, Xiangyuan Wang, Yuyu Yao, Ruijie Ni, Xiaoyue Jiang, Xiaofan Nie, Jingping |
| author_facet | Xue, Xiangyuan Wang, Yuyu Yao, Ruijie Ni, Xiaoyue Jiang, Xiaofan Nie, Jingping |
| contents | Automatic speech recognition (ASR) has been extensively studied on neutral and stationary speech, yet its robustness under post-exercise physiological shift remains underexplored. Compared with resting speech, post-exercise speech often contains micro-breaths, non-semantic pauses, unstable phonation, and repetitions caused by reduced breath support, making transcription more difficult. In this work, we benchmark acoustic foundation models on post-exercise speech under a unified evaluation protocol. We compare sequence-to-sequence models (Whisper and FunASR/Paraformer) and self-supervised encoders with CTC decoding (Wav2Vec2, HuBERT, and WavLM), under both off-the-shelf inference and post-exercise in-domain fine-tuning. Across the Static/Post-All benchmark, most models degrade on post-exercise speech, while FunASR shows the strongest baseline robustness at 14.57% WER and 8.21% CER on Post-All. Fine-tuning substantially improves several CTC-based models, whereas Whisper shows unstable adaptation. As an exploratory case study, we further stratify results by fluent and non-fluent speakers; although the non-fluent subset is small, it is consistently more challenging than the fluent subset. Overall, our findings show that post-exercise ASR robustness is strongly model-dependent, that in-domain adaptation can be highly effective but not uniformly stable, and that future post-exercise ASR studies should explicitly separate fluency-related effects from exercise-induced speech variation. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_27508 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Investigation on the Robustness of Acoustic Foundation Models on Post Exercise Speech Xue, Xiangyuan Wang, Yuyu Yao, Ruijie Ni, Xiaoyue Jiang, Xiaofan Nie, Jingping Sound Automatic speech recognition (ASR) has been extensively studied on neutral and stationary speech, yet its robustness under post-exercise physiological shift remains underexplored. Compared with resting speech, post-exercise speech often contains micro-breaths, non-semantic pauses, unstable phonation, and repetitions caused by reduced breath support, making transcription more difficult. In this work, we benchmark acoustic foundation models on post-exercise speech under a unified evaluation protocol. We compare sequence-to-sequence models (Whisper and FunASR/Paraformer) and self-supervised encoders with CTC decoding (Wav2Vec2, HuBERT, and WavLM), under both off-the-shelf inference and post-exercise in-domain fine-tuning. Across the Static/Post-All benchmark, most models degrade on post-exercise speech, while FunASR shows the strongest baseline robustness at 14.57% WER and 8.21% CER on Post-All. Fine-tuning substantially improves several CTC-based models, whereas Whisper shows unstable adaptation. As an exploratory case study, we further stratify results by fluent and non-fluent speakers; although the non-fluent subset is small, it is consistently more challenging than the fluent subset. Overall, our findings show that post-exercise ASR robustness is strongly model-dependent, that in-domain adaptation can be highly effective but not uniformly stable, and that future post-exercise ASR studies should explicitly separate fluency-related effects from exercise-induced speech variation. |
| title | Investigation on the Robustness of Acoustic Foundation Models on Post Exercise Speech |
| topic | Sound |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27508 |