Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robertshaw, Harry, Barnes, Anna, Blakelock, Phil, Blanc, Raphael, Crossley, Robert, Fahrig, Rebecca, Hassan, Ameer E., Jackson, Benjamin, Karstensen, Lennart, Kaur, Neelam, Kowarschik, Markus, Lynch, Jeremy, Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska, Meglan, Dwight, Pereira, Vitor Mendes, Ourak, Mouloud, Pantano, Matteo, Sadati, S. M. Hadi, Taylor-Gee, Alice, Vercauteren, Tom, White, Phil, Granados, Alejandro, Booth, Thomas C.
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28129
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866914536113569792
author Robertshaw, Harry
Barnes, Anna
Blakelock, Phil
Blanc, Raphael
Crossley, Robert
Fahrig, Rebecca
Hassan, Ameer E.
Jackson, Benjamin
Karstensen, Lennart
Kaur, Neelam
Kowarschik, Markus
Lynch, Jeremy
Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska
Meglan, Dwight
Pereira, Vitor Mendes
Ourak, Mouloud
Pantano, Matteo
Sadati, S. M. Hadi
Taylor-Gee, Alice
Vercauteren, Tom
White, Phil
Granados, Alejandro
Booth, Thomas C.
author_facet Robertshaw, Harry
Barnes, Anna
Blakelock, Phil
Blanc, Raphael
Crossley, Robert
Fahrig, Rebecca
Hassan, Ameer E.
Jackson, Benjamin
Karstensen, Lennart
Kaur, Neelam
Kowarschik, Markus
Lynch, Jeremy
Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska
Meglan, Dwight
Pereira, Vitor Mendes
Ourak, Mouloud
Pantano, Matteo
Sadati, S. M. Hadi
Taylor-Gee, Alice
Vercauteren, Tom
White, Phil
Granados, Alejandro
Booth, Thomas C.
contents While we are making progress in overcoming infectious diseases and cancer; one of the major medical challenges of the mid-21st century will be the rising prevalence of stroke. Large vessels occlusions are especially debilitating, yet effective treatment (needed within hours to achieve best outcomes) remains limited due to geography. One solution for improving timely access to mechanical thrombectomy in geographically diverse populations is the deployment of robotic surgical systems. Artificial intelligence (AI) assistance may enable the upskilling of operators in this emerging therapeutic delivery approach. Our aim was to establish consensus frameworks for developing and validating AI-assisted robots for thrombectomy. Objectives included standardizing effectiveness metrics and defining reference testbeds across in silico, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo environments. To achieve this, we convened experts in neurointervention, robotics, data science, health economics, policy, statistics, and patient advocacy. Consensus was built through an incubator day, a Delphi process, and a final Position Statement. We identified that the four essential testbed environments each had distinct validation roles. Realism requirements vary: simpler testbeds should include realistic vessel anatomy compatible with guidewire and catheter use, while standard testbeds should incorporate deformable vessels. More advanced testbeds should include blood flow, pulsatility, and disease features. There are two macro-classes of effectiveness metrics: one for in silico, in vitro, and ex vivo stages focusing on technical navigation, and another for in vivo stages, focused on clinical outcomes. Patient safety is central to this technology's development. One requisite patient safety task needed now is to correlate in vitro measurements to in vivo complications.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_28129
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A Position Statement on Endovascular Models and Effectiveness Metrics for Mechanical Thrombectomy Navigation, on behalf of the Stakeholder Taskforce for AI-assisted Robotic Thrombectomy (START)
Robertshaw, Harry
Barnes, Anna
Blakelock, Phil
Blanc, Raphael
Crossley, Robert
Fahrig, Rebecca
Hassan, Ameer E.
Jackson, Benjamin
Karstensen, Lennart
Kaur, Neelam
Kowarschik, Markus
Lynch, Jeremy
Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska
Meglan, Dwight
Pereira, Vitor Mendes
Ourak, Mouloud
Pantano, Matteo
Sadati, S. M. Hadi
Taylor-Gee, Alice
Vercauteren, Tom
White, Phil
Granados, Alejandro
Booth, Thomas C.
Robotics
While we are making progress in overcoming infectious diseases and cancer; one of the major medical challenges of the mid-21st century will be the rising prevalence of stroke. Large vessels occlusions are especially debilitating, yet effective treatment (needed within hours to achieve best outcomes) remains limited due to geography. One solution for improving timely access to mechanical thrombectomy in geographically diverse populations is the deployment of robotic surgical systems. Artificial intelligence (AI) assistance may enable the upskilling of operators in this emerging therapeutic delivery approach. Our aim was to establish consensus frameworks for developing and validating AI-assisted robots for thrombectomy. Objectives included standardizing effectiveness metrics and defining reference testbeds across in silico, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo environments. To achieve this, we convened experts in neurointervention, robotics, data science, health economics, policy, statistics, and patient advocacy. Consensus was built through an incubator day, a Delphi process, and a final Position Statement. We identified that the four essential testbed environments each had distinct validation roles. Realism requirements vary: simpler testbeds should include realistic vessel anatomy compatible with guidewire and catheter use, while standard testbeds should incorporate deformable vessels. More advanced testbeds should include blood flow, pulsatility, and disease features. There are two macro-classes of effectiveness metrics: one for in silico, in vitro, and ex vivo stages focusing on technical navigation, and another for in vivo stages, focused on clinical outcomes. Patient safety is central to this technology's development. One requisite patient safety task needed now is to correlate in vitro measurements to in vivo complications.
title A Position Statement on Endovascular Models and Effectiveness Metrics for Mechanical Thrombectomy Navigation, on behalf of the Stakeholder Taskforce for AI-assisted Robotic Thrombectomy (START)
topic Robotics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28129