GEditBench v2: A Human-Aligned Benchmark for General Image Editing

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Zhangqi, Sun, Zheng, Zeng, Xianfang, Yang, Yufeng, Zhang, Xuanyang, Wu, Yongliang, Cheng, Wei, Yu, Gang, Yang, Xu, Wen, Bihan
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866908921284788224
author Jiang, Zhangqi
Sun, Zheng
Zeng, Xianfang
Yang, Yufeng
Zhang, Xuanyang
Wu, Yongliang
Cheng, Wei
Yu, Gang
Yang, Xu
Wen, Bihan
author_facet Jiang, Zhangqi
Sun, Zheng
Zeng, Xianfang
Yang, Yufeng
Zhang, Xuanyang
Wu, Yongliang
Cheng, Wei
Yu, Gang
Yang, Xu
Wen, Bihan
contents Recent advances in image editing have enabled models to handle complex instructions with impressive realism. However, existing evaluation frameworks lag behind: current benchmarks suffer from narrow task coverage, while standard metrics fail to adequately capture visual consistency, i.e., the preservation of identity, structure and semantic coherence between edited and original images. To address these limitations, we introduce GEditBench v2, a comprehensive benchmark with 1,200 real-world user queries spanning 23 tasks, including a dedicated open-set category for unconstrained, out-of-distribution editing instructions beyond predefined tasks. Furthermore, we propose PVC-Judge, an open-source pairwise assessment model for visual consistency, trained via two novel region-decoupled preference data synthesis pipelines. Besides, we construct VCReward-Bench using expert-annotated preference pairs to assess the alignment of PVC-Judge with human judgments on visual consistency evaluation. Experiments show that our PVC-Judge achieves state-of-the-art evaluation performance among open-source models and even surpasses GPT-5.1 on average. Finally, by benchmarking 16 frontier editing models, we show that GEditBench v2 enables more human-aligned evaluation, revealing critical limitations of current models, and providing a reliable foundation for advancing precise image editing.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_28547
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle GEditBench v2: A Human-Aligned Benchmark for General Image Editing
Jiang, Zhangqi
Sun, Zheng
Zeng, Xianfang
Yang, Yufeng
Zhang, Xuanyang
Wu, Yongliang
Cheng, Wei
Yu, Gang
Yang, Xu
Wen, Bihan
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Recent advances in image editing have enabled models to handle complex instructions with impressive realism. However, existing evaluation frameworks lag behind: current benchmarks suffer from narrow task coverage, while standard metrics fail to adequately capture visual consistency, i.e., the preservation of identity, structure and semantic coherence between edited and original images. To address these limitations, we introduce GEditBench v2, a comprehensive benchmark with 1,200 real-world user queries spanning 23 tasks, including a dedicated open-set category for unconstrained, out-of-distribution editing instructions beyond predefined tasks. Furthermore, we propose PVC-Judge, an open-source pairwise assessment model for visual consistency, trained via two novel region-decoupled preference data synthesis pipelines. Besides, we construct VCReward-Bench using expert-annotated preference pairs to assess the alignment of PVC-Judge with human judgments on visual consistency evaluation. Experiments show that our PVC-Judge achieves state-of-the-art evaluation performance among open-source models and even surpasses GPT-5.1 on average. Finally, by benchmarking 16 frontier editing models, we show that GEditBench v2 enables more human-aligned evaluation, revealing critical limitations of current models, and providing a reliable foundation for advancing precise image editing.
title GEditBench v2: A Human-Aligned Benchmark for General Image Editing
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28547