Theory of Mind and Self-Attributions of Mentality are Dissociable in LLMs

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Kim, Junsol, Street, Winnie, Rocca, Roberta, Korngiebel, Daine M., Waytz, Adam, Evans, James, Keeling, Geoff
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866918418860474368
author Kim, Junsol
Street, Winnie
Rocca, Roberta
Korngiebel, Daine M.
Waytz, Adam
Evans, James
Keeling, Geoff
author_facet Kim, Junsol
Street, Winnie
Rocca, Roberta
Korngiebel, Daine M.
Waytz, Adam
Evans, James
Keeling, Geoff
contents Safety fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) seeks to suppress potentially harmful forms of mind-attribution such as models asserting their own consciousness or claiming to experience emotions. We investigate whether suppressing mind-attribution tendencies degrades intimately related socio-cognitive abilities such as Theory of Mind (ToM). Through safety ablation and mechanistic analyses of representational similarity, we demonstrate that LLM attributions of mind to themselves and to technological artefacts are behaviorally and mechanistically dissociable from ToM capabilities. Nevertheless, safety fine-tuned models under-attribute mind to non-human animals relative to human baselines and are less likely to exhibit spiritual belief, suppressing widely shared perspectives regarding the distribution and nature of non-human minds.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_28925
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Theory of Mind and Self-Attributions of Mentality are Dissociable in LLMs
Kim, Junsol
Street, Winnie
Rocca, Roberta
Korngiebel, Daine M.
Waytz, Adam
Evans, James
Keeling, Geoff
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Safety fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) seeks to suppress potentially harmful forms of mind-attribution such as models asserting their own consciousness or claiming to experience emotions. We investigate whether suppressing mind-attribution tendencies degrades intimately related socio-cognitive abilities such as Theory of Mind (ToM). Through safety ablation and mechanistic analyses of representational similarity, we demonstrate that LLM attributions of mind to themselves and to technological artefacts are behaviorally and mechanistically dissociable from ToM capabilities. Nevertheless, safety fine-tuned models under-attribute mind to non-human animals relative to human baselines and are less likely to exhibit spiritual belief, suppressing widely shared perspectives regarding the distribution and nature of non-human minds.
title Theory of Mind and Self-Attributions of Mentality are Dissociable in LLMs
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28925