Same Rules, Mixed Messages: Exploring Community Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in Computing Education

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, Chandler C., Hackney, Kai A., Zangari, Lucas Guarenti, Kalogeras, Sterling R., Munoz, Emmanuel, Sánchez-Gómez, Juan Sebastián, Omojokun, Olufisayo, Feijóo-García, Pedro Guillermo
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866914435302424576
author Payne, Chandler C.
Hackney, Kai A.
Zangari, Lucas Guarenti
Kalogeras, Sterling R.
Munoz, Emmanuel
Sánchez-Gómez, Juan Sebastián
Omojokun, Olufisayo
Feijóo-García, Pedro Guillermo
author_facet Payne, Chandler C.
Hackney, Kai A.
Zangari, Lucas Guarenti
Kalogeras, Sterling R.
Munoz, Emmanuel
Sánchez-Gómez, Juan Sebastián
Omojokun, Olufisayo
Feijóo-García, Pedro Guillermo
contents Academic dishonesty has long been a concern in computing education, and the rapid growth of online learning and generative artificial intelligence (AI) has further complicated how cheating is perceived and addressed. We report on a study examining how different actors in the computer science (CS) classroom interpret potential cheating scenarios and the motivations behind academic dishonesty. Participants included instructors (n = 6), teaching assistants (TAs; n = 21), and undergraduate students (n = 538) enrolled in two CS courses at a large Southeastern institution in the United States. Respondents classified scenarios as serious cheating, trivial cheating, or not cheating and answered to an open-ended question about motivations for academic dishonesty. Our findings reveal notable discrepancies across groups: instructors most often attribute cheating to grade pressure and laziness, while students and TAs emphasize gaps in prerequisite knowledge and time management challenges. These results highlight misaligned perceptions of academic dishonesty and underscore the need for clearer communication and curricular strategies in computing education, particularly in post-COVID learning environments where hybrid instruction, increased reliance on digital resources, and AI-assisted tools have reshaped students' approaches to coursework and learning.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2603_29762
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Same Rules, Mixed Messages: Exploring Community Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in Computing Education
Payne, Chandler C.
Hackney, Kai A.
Zangari, Lucas Guarenti
Kalogeras, Sterling R.
Munoz, Emmanuel
Sánchez-Gómez, Juan Sebastián
Omojokun, Olufisayo
Feijóo-García, Pedro Guillermo
Computers and Society
Academic dishonesty has long been a concern in computing education, and the rapid growth of online learning and generative artificial intelligence (AI) has further complicated how cheating is perceived and addressed. We report on a study examining how different actors in the computer science (CS) classroom interpret potential cheating scenarios and the motivations behind academic dishonesty. Participants included instructors (n = 6), teaching assistants (TAs; n = 21), and undergraduate students (n = 538) enrolled in two CS courses at a large Southeastern institution in the United States. Respondents classified scenarios as serious cheating, trivial cheating, or not cheating and answered to an open-ended question about motivations for academic dishonesty. Our findings reveal notable discrepancies across groups: instructors most often attribute cheating to grade pressure and laziness, while students and TAs emphasize gaps in prerequisite knowledge and time management challenges. These results highlight misaligned perceptions of academic dishonesty and underscore the need for clearer communication and curricular strategies in computing education, particularly in post-COVID learning environments where hybrid instruction, increased reliance on digital resources, and AI-assisted tools have reshaped students' approaches to coursework and learning.
title Same Rules, Mixed Messages: Exploring Community Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in Computing Education
topic Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29762