Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00002 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866912993147617280 |
|---|---|
| author | Makri, Eftychia Nakis, Nikolaos Sisson, Laura Minsky, Gigi Tassiulas, Leandros Satarifard, Vahid Christakis, Nicholas A. |
| author_facet | Makri, Eftychia Nakis, Nikolaos Sisson, Laura Minsky, Gigi Tassiulas, Leandros Satarifard, Vahid Christakis, Nicholas A. |
| contents | Here we introduce the Olfactory Perception (OP) benchmark, designed to assess the capability of large language models (LLMs) to reason about smell. The benchmark contains 1,010 questions across eight task categories spanning odor classification, odor primary descriptor identification, intensity and pleasantness judgments, multi-descriptor prediction, mixture similarity, olfactory receptor activation, and smell identification from real-world odor sources. Each question is presented in two prompt formats, compound names and isomeric SMILES, to evaluate the effect of molecular representations. Evaluating 21 model configurations across major model families, we find that compound-name prompts consistently outperform isomeric SMILES, with gains ranging from +2.4 to +18.9 percentage points (mean approx +7 points), suggesting current LLMs access olfactory knowledge primarily through lexical associations rather than structural molecular reasoning. The best-performing model reaches 64.4\% overall accuracy, which highlights both emerging capabilities and substantial remaining gaps in olfactory reasoning. We further evaluate a subset of the OP across 21 languages and find that aggregating predictions across languages improves olfactory prediction, with AUROC = 0.86 for the best performing language ensemble model. LLMs should be able to handle olfactory and not just visual or aural information. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_00002 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Benchmark for Assessing Olfactory Perception of Large Language Models Makri, Eftychia Nakis, Nikolaos Sisson, Laura Minsky, Gigi Tassiulas, Leandros Satarifard, Vahid Christakis, Nicholas A. Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Here we introduce the Olfactory Perception (OP) benchmark, designed to assess the capability of large language models (LLMs) to reason about smell. The benchmark contains 1,010 questions across eight task categories spanning odor classification, odor primary descriptor identification, intensity and pleasantness judgments, multi-descriptor prediction, mixture similarity, olfactory receptor activation, and smell identification from real-world odor sources. Each question is presented in two prompt formats, compound names and isomeric SMILES, to evaluate the effect of molecular representations. Evaluating 21 model configurations across major model families, we find that compound-name prompts consistently outperform isomeric SMILES, with gains ranging from +2.4 to +18.9 percentage points (mean approx +7 points), suggesting current LLMs access olfactory knowledge primarily through lexical associations rather than structural molecular reasoning. The best-performing model reaches 64.4\% overall accuracy, which highlights both emerging capabilities and substantial remaining gaps in olfactory reasoning. We further evaluate a subset of the OP across 21 languages and find that aggregating predictions across languages improves olfactory prediction, with AUROC = 0.86 for the best performing language ensemble model. LLMs should be able to handle olfactory and not just visual or aural information. |
| title | Benchmark for Assessing Olfactory Perception of Large Language Models |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00002 |