Practice Less, Explain More: LLM-Supported Self-Explanation Improves Explanation Quality on Transfer Problems in Calculus
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866917550020886528 |
|---|---|
| author | Chen, Eason Tang, Xinyi Zhao, Yvonne Chen, Meiyi Elmir, Meryam McLaughlin, Elizabeth Yuan, Mingyu Wang, Yumo Agarwal, Shyam Cochrane, Jared Lin, Jionghao Wu, Tongshuang Koedinger, Ken |
| author_facet | Chen, Eason Tang, Xinyi Zhao, Yvonne Chen, Meiyi Elmir, Meryam McLaughlin, Elizabeth Yuan, Mingyu Wang, Yumo Agarwal, Shyam Cochrane, Jared Lin, Jionghao Wu, Tongshuang Koedinger, Ken |
| contents | We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N=92) comparing three conditions in a calculus learning environment: no self-explanation (control), menu-based self-explanation, and open-ended self-explanation with LLM-generated feedback. All conditions showed positive learning gains within a fixed 60-minute practice session, with no significant between-condition differences in post-test performance. On transfer questions, the open-ended condition produced significantly higher-quality explanations than control on "Not Enough Information" (NEI) problems ($β$=+11.9 percentage points, $p$=.030), though the corresponding NEI multiple-choice accuracy advantage was not significant ($p$=.183). Moreover, across all post-test open-ended explanations, the open-ended condition showed a marginally significant advantage ($β$=+7.3%, $p$=.057). These findings suggest that LLM-supported open-ended self-explanation can improve explanation quality on NEI transfer problems, with weaker evidence across broader transfer explanation measures. Notably, these effects emerged even though learners in the open-ended condition completed substantially fewer practice problems within the same practice time. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_00142 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Practice Less, Explain More: LLM-Supported Self-Explanation Improves Explanation Quality on Transfer Problems in Calculus Chen, Eason Tang, Xinyi Zhao, Yvonne Chen, Meiyi Elmir, Meryam McLaughlin, Elizabeth Yuan, Mingyu Wang, Yumo Agarwal, Shyam Cochrane, Jared Lin, Jionghao Wu, Tongshuang Koedinger, Ken Human-Computer Interaction We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N=92) comparing three conditions in a calculus learning environment: no self-explanation (control), menu-based self-explanation, and open-ended self-explanation with LLM-generated feedback. All conditions showed positive learning gains within a fixed 60-minute practice session, with no significant between-condition differences in post-test performance. On transfer questions, the open-ended condition produced significantly higher-quality explanations than control on "Not Enough Information" (NEI) problems ($β$=+11.9 percentage points, $p$=.030), though the corresponding NEI multiple-choice accuracy advantage was not significant ($p$=.183). Moreover, across all post-test open-ended explanations, the open-ended condition showed a marginally significant advantage ($β$=+7.3%, $p$=.057). These findings suggest that LLM-supported open-ended self-explanation can improve explanation quality on NEI transfer problems, with weaker evidence across broader transfer explanation measures. Notably, these effects emerged even though learners in the open-ended condition completed substantially fewer practice problems within the same practice time. |
| title | Practice Less, Explain More: LLM-Supported Self-Explanation Improves Explanation Quality on Transfer Problems in Calculus |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00142 |