Polysemanticity or Polysemy? Lexical Identity Confounds Superposition Metrics

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Hou, Iyad Ait, Hwa, Rebecca
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866918422936289280
author Hou, Iyad Ait
Hwa, Rebecca
author_facet Hou, Iyad Ait
Hwa, Rebecca
contents If the same neuron activates for both "lender" and "riverside," standard metrics attribute the overlap to superposition--the neuron must be compressing two unrelated concepts. This work explores how much of the overlap is due a lexical confound: neurons fire for a shared word form (such as "bank") rather than for two compressed concepts. A 2x2 factorial decomposition reveals that the lexical-only condition (same word, different meaning) consistently exceeds the semantic-only condition (different word, same meaning) across models spanning 110M-70B parameters. The confound carries into sparse autoencoders (18-36% of features blend senses), sits in <=1% of activation dimensions, and hurts downstream tasks: filtering it out improves word sense disambiguation and makes knowledge edits more selective (p = 0.002).
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_00443
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Polysemanticity or Polysemy? Lexical Identity Confounds Superposition Metrics
Hou, Iyad Ait
Hwa, Rebecca
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
If the same neuron activates for both "lender" and "riverside," standard metrics attribute the overlap to superposition--the neuron must be compressing two unrelated concepts. This work explores how much of the overlap is due a lexical confound: neurons fire for a shared word form (such as "bank") rather than for two compressed concepts. A 2x2 factorial decomposition reveals that the lexical-only condition (same word, different meaning) consistently exceeds the semantic-only condition (different word, same meaning) across models spanning 110M-70B parameters. The confound carries into sparse autoencoders (18-36% of features blend senses), sits in <=1% of activation dimensions, and hurts downstream tasks: filtering it out improves word sense disambiguation and makes knowledge edits more selective (p = 0.002).
title Polysemanticity or Polysemy? Lexical Identity Confounds Superposition Metrics
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00443