Price of Anarchy of Algorithmic Monoculture
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866912994677489664 |
|---|---|
| author | Kleinberg, Robert Sinanaj, Erald Tardos, Éva |
| author_facet | Kleinberg, Robert Sinanaj, Erald Tardos, Éva |
| contents | Several recent works investigate the effects of monoculture, the ever increasing phenomenon of (possibly) self-interested actors in a society relying on one common source of advice for decision making, with an archetypal driving example being the growing adoption and predictive power of machine learning models in matching markets, e.g. in hiring. Kleinberg and Raghavan (PNAS, 2021) introduced a model that captures the effects of monoculture in a one-sided matching market with advice, demonstrating that a higher accuracy common signal (such as an algorithmic vendor) might incentivize society as a whole to rationally adopt it, but as a collective it would be better off if each instead adopted less accurate, but private advice. We generalize their model and address the open question of their work in quantifying the social welfare loss. We find that monoculture and more generally decentralized optimization is close to optimal: we show a tight constant bound of 2 on the price of anarchy (and more general notions) for the induced game. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_00444 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Price of Anarchy of Algorithmic Monoculture Kleinberg, Robert Sinanaj, Erald Tardos, Éva Computer Science and Game Theory Computers and Society Several recent works investigate the effects of monoculture, the ever increasing phenomenon of (possibly) self-interested actors in a society relying on one common source of advice for decision making, with an archetypal driving example being the growing adoption and predictive power of machine learning models in matching markets, e.g. in hiring. Kleinberg and Raghavan (PNAS, 2021) introduced a model that captures the effects of monoculture in a one-sided matching market with advice, demonstrating that a higher accuracy common signal (such as an algorithmic vendor) might incentivize society as a whole to rationally adopt it, but as a collective it would be better off if each instead adopted less accurate, but private advice. We generalize their model and address the open question of their work in quantifying the social welfare loss. We find that monoculture and more generally decentralized optimization is close to optimal: we show a tight constant bound of 2 on the price of anarchy (and more general notions) for the induced game. |
| title | Price of Anarchy of Algorithmic Monoculture |
| topic | Computer Science and Game Theory Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00444 |