Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garg, Piyush, Gergel, Diana R., Shao, Andrew E., Yacalis, Galen J.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01215
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908931703439360
author Garg, Piyush
Gergel, Diana R.
Shao, Andrew E.
Yacalis, Galen J.
author_facet Garg, Piyush
Gergel, Diana R.
Shao, Andrew E.
Yacalis, Galen J.
contents AI weather prediction has advanced rapidly, yet no unified mathematical framework explains what determines forecast skill. Existing theory addresses specific architectural choices rather than the learning pipeline as a whole, while operational evidence from 2023-2026 demonstrates that training methodology, loss function design, and data diversity matter at least as much as architecture selection. This paper makes two interleaved contributions. Theoretically, we construct a framework rooted in approximation theory on the sphere, dynamical systems theory, information theory, and statistical learning theory that treats the complete learning pipeline (architecture, loss function, training strategy, data distribution) rather than architecture alone. We establish a Learning Pipeline Error Decomposition showing that estimation error (loss- and data-dependent) dominates approximation error (architecture-dependent) at current scales. We develop a Loss Function Spectral Theory formalizing MSE-induced spectral blurring in spherical harmonic coordinates, and derive Out-of-Distribution Extrapolation Bounds proving that data-driven models systematically underestimate record-breaking extremes with bias growing linearly in record exceedance. Empirically, we validate these predictions via inference across ten architecturally diverse AI weather models using NVIDIA Earth2Studio with ERA5 initial conditions, evaluating six metrics across 30 initialization dates spanning all seasons. Results confirm universal spectral energy loss at high wavenumbers for MSE-trained models, rising Error Consensus Ratios showing that the majority of forecast error is shared across architectures, and linear negative bias during extreme events. A Holistic Model Assessment Score provides unified multi-dimensional evaluation, and a prescriptive framework enables mathematical evaluation of proposed pipelines before training.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_01215
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The Recipe Matters More Than the Kitchen:Mathematical Foundations of the AI Weather Prediction Pipeline
Garg, Piyush
Gergel, Diana R.
Shao, Andrew E.
Yacalis, Galen J.
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
AI weather prediction has advanced rapidly, yet no unified mathematical framework explains what determines forecast skill. Existing theory addresses specific architectural choices rather than the learning pipeline as a whole, while operational evidence from 2023-2026 demonstrates that training methodology, loss function design, and data diversity matter at least as much as architecture selection. This paper makes two interleaved contributions. Theoretically, we construct a framework rooted in approximation theory on the sphere, dynamical systems theory, information theory, and statistical learning theory that treats the complete learning pipeline (architecture, loss function, training strategy, data distribution) rather than architecture alone. We establish a Learning Pipeline Error Decomposition showing that estimation error (loss- and data-dependent) dominates approximation error (architecture-dependent) at current scales. We develop a Loss Function Spectral Theory formalizing MSE-induced spectral blurring in spherical harmonic coordinates, and derive Out-of-Distribution Extrapolation Bounds proving that data-driven models systematically underestimate record-breaking extremes with bias growing linearly in record exceedance. Empirically, we validate these predictions via inference across ten architecturally diverse AI weather models using NVIDIA Earth2Studio with ERA5 initial conditions, evaluating six metrics across 30 initialization dates spanning all seasons. Results confirm universal spectral energy loss at high wavenumbers for MSE-trained models, rising Error Consensus Ratios showing that the majority of forecast error is shared across architectures, and linear negative bias during extreme events. A Holistic Model Assessment Score provides unified multi-dimensional evaluation, and a prescriptive framework enables mathematical evaluation of proposed pipelines before training.
title The Recipe Matters More Than the Kitchen:Mathematical Foundations of the AI Weather Prediction Pipeline
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01215