IDEA2: Expert-in-the-loop competency question elicitation for collaborative ontology engineering

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watkiss-Leek, Elliott, Alharbi, Reham, Rostron, Harry, Ng, Andrew, Johnson, Ewan, Mitchell, Andrew, Payne, Terry R., Tamma, Valentina, de Berardinis, Jacopo
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866914439155941376
author Watkiss-Leek, Elliott
Alharbi, Reham
Rostron, Harry
Ng, Andrew
Johnson, Ewan
Mitchell, Andrew
Payne, Terry R.
Tamma, Valentina
de Berardinis, Jacopo
author_facet Watkiss-Leek, Elliott
Alharbi, Reham
Rostron, Harry
Ng, Andrew
Johnson, Ewan
Mitchell, Andrew
Payne, Terry R.
Tamma, Valentina
de Berardinis, Jacopo
contents Competency question (CQ) elicitation represents a critical but resource-intensive bottleneck in ontology engineering. This foundational phase is often hampered by the communication gap between domain experts, who possess the necessary knowledge, and ontology engineers, who formalise it. This paper introduces IDEA2, a novel, semi-automated workflow that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) within a collaborative, expert-in-the-loop process to address this challenge. The methodology is characterised by a core iterative loop: an initial LLM-based extraction of CQs from requirement documents, a co-creational review and feedback phase by domain experts on an accessible collaborative platform, and an iterative, feedback-driven reformulation of rejected CQs by an LLM until consensus is achieved. To ensure transparency and reproducibility, the entire lifecycle of each CQ is tracked using a provenance model that captures the full lineage of edits, anonymised feedback, and generation parameters. The workflow was validated in 2 real-world scenarios (scientific data, cultural heritage), demonstrating that IDEA2 can accelerate the requirements engineering process, improve the acceptance and relevance of the resulting CQs, and exhibit high usability and effectiveness among domain experts. We release all code and experiments at https://github.com/KE-UniLiv/IDEA2
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_01344
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle IDEA2: Expert-in-the-loop competency question elicitation for collaborative ontology engineering
Watkiss-Leek, Elliott
Alharbi, Reham
Rostron, Harry
Ng, Andrew
Johnson, Ewan
Mitchell, Andrew
Payne, Terry R.
Tamma, Valentina
de Berardinis, Jacopo
Artificial Intelligence
Competency question (CQ) elicitation represents a critical but resource-intensive bottleneck in ontology engineering. This foundational phase is often hampered by the communication gap between domain experts, who possess the necessary knowledge, and ontology engineers, who formalise it. This paper introduces IDEA2, a novel, semi-automated workflow that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) within a collaborative, expert-in-the-loop process to address this challenge. The methodology is characterised by a core iterative loop: an initial LLM-based extraction of CQs from requirement documents, a co-creational review and feedback phase by domain experts on an accessible collaborative platform, and an iterative, feedback-driven reformulation of rejected CQs by an LLM until consensus is achieved. To ensure transparency and reproducibility, the entire lifecycle of each CQ is tracked using a provenance model that captures the full lineage of edits, anonymised feedback, and generation parameters. The workflow was validated in 2 real-world scenarios (scientific data, cultural heritage), demonstrating that IDEA2 can accelerate the requirements engineering process, improve the acceptance and relevance of the resulting CQs, and exhibit high usability and effectiveness among domain experts. We release all code and experiments at https://github.com/KE-UniLiv/IDEA2
title IDEA2: Expert-in-the-loop competency question elicitation for collaborative ontology engineering
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01344