Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01484 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866912997670125568 |
|---|---|
| author | Loftus, Matthew |
| author_facet | Loftus, Matthew |
| contents | The topological gap $Δ= TP_{H_1}^{real} - TP_{H_1}^{shuf}$ -- the excess $H_1$ total persistence of the majority-spin alpha complex over a density-matched null -- encodes critical correlations in spin models. We establish finite-size scaling: $Δ(L,T) = A L^{d+η} G_-(L|t/T_c|)$, with $G_-(x) \sim (1+x/x_0)^{-(1+β/ν)}$. For 2D Ising, $α= 2.249 \pm 0.038$, matching $d+η= 9/4$ to $0.03σ$; the $G_-$ exponent $γ= 1.089 \pm 0.077$ is consistent with $1+β/ν= 9/8$ ($ΔR^2 < 10^{-5}$). For 2D Potts $q=3$ with $L$ up to 1024, $α= 2.272 \pm 0.024$ ($0.2σ$ from $d+η= 2.267$), with two-term corrections to scaling ($R^2 = 0.9999$). The $G_-$ exponent $γ= 1.114$ (68% CI $[1.053, 1.173]$) matches $1+β/ν= 17/15$. Scope boundaries: the law fails for 2D Potts $q=4$ ($α= 2.347 \pm 0.017$, $9.3σ$ from $d+η= 5/2$) where logarithmic corrections prevent convergence, and for raw 3D Ising ($4σ$ from $d+η$), but density normalization $Δ/|M|^{1/2}$ recovers $α= 3.06 \pm 0.04$ ($0.6σ$). The framework fails for first-order, BKT, and percolation. The criterion: $α= d+η$ holds when corrections to scaling are algebraic ($ω> 0$) but fails when logarithmic ($ω\to 0$). |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_01484 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The topological gap at criticality: scaling exponent d + η, universality, and scope Loftus, Matthew Statistical Mechanics Machine Learning The topological gap $Δ= TP_{H_1}^{real} - TP_{H_1}^{shuf}$ -- the excess $H_1$ total persistence of the majority-spin alpha complex over a density-matched null -- encodes critical correlations in spin models. We establish finite-size scaling: $Δ(L,T) = A L^{d+η} G_-(L|t/T_c|)$, with $G_-(x) \sim (1+x/x_0)^{-(1+β/ν)}$. For 2D Ising, $α= 2.249 \pm 0.038$, matching $d+η= 9/4$ to $0.03σ$; the $G_-$ exponent $γ= 1.089 \pm 0.077$ is consistent with $1+β/ν= 9/8$ ($ΔR^2 < 10^{-5}$). For 2D Potts $q=3$ with $L$ up to 1024, $α= 2.272 \pm 0.024$ ($0.2σ$ from $d+η= 2.267$), with two-term corrections to scaling ($R^2 = 0.9999$). The $G_-$ exponent $γ= 1.114$ (68% CI $[1.053, 1.173]$) matches $1+β/ν= 17/15$. Scope boundaries: the law fails for 2D Potts $q=4$ ($α= 2.347 \pm 0.017$, $9.3σ$ from $d+η= 5/2$) where logarithmic corrections prevent convergence, and for raw 3D Ising ($4σ$ from $d+η$), but density normalization $Δ/|M|^{1/2}$ recovers $α= 3.06 \pm 0.04$ ($0.6σ$). The framework fails for first-order, BKT, and percolation. The criterion: $α= d+η$ holds when corrections to scaling are algebraic ($ω> 0$) but fails when logarithmic ($ω\to 0$). |
| title | The topological gap at criticality: scaling exponent d + η, universality, and scope |
| topic | Statistical Mechanics Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01484 |