Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beauchesne, Jocelyn, Maroti, Christine, Bratman, Jeshua, Pesenti, Jerome, Holt, Laurence, Tambellini, Alex, McGrath, Allison, Guo, Matthew, Peterson, Sarah
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03246
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917383624458240
author Beauchesne, Jocelyn
Maroti, Christine
Bratman, Jeshua
Pesenti, Jerome
Holt, Laurence
Tambellini, Alex
McGrath, Allison
Guo, Matthew
Peterson, Sarah
author_facet Beauchesne, Jocelyn
Maroti, Christine
Bratman, Jeshua
Pesenti, Jerome
Holt, Laurence
Tambellini, Alex
McGrath, Allison
Guo, Matthew
Peterson, Sarah
contents Recent research demonstrated that students exhibit consistent learning rates across diverse educational contexts. We test these findings using a dataset of 1.8 million (366k post-filtering) student interactions from the digital platform Campus AI providing further evidence to the observation of regularity in learning rate among students. Unlike prior work requiring manual cognitive modeling, Campus AI automatically generates Knowledge Components (KCs) and corresponding exercises, both of which are validated by human experts. This one-to-many mapping facilitates the application of Additive Factors Models to measure learning parameters without complex cognitive modeling. Using mixed-effects logistic regression, we confirmed the core finding of prior work: students displayed substantial variation in initial knowledge ($\text{IQR} = [2.78, 12.18]$ practice opportunities to reach 80% mastery) but remarkably consistent learning rates ($\text{IQR} = [7.01, 8.25]$ opportunities). Furthermore, students using this fully automated system achieved 80% mastery in a median of 7.22 practice opportunities, comparable to the 6.54 reported for expert-designed curricula. These results suggest that automated, science-grounded content generation can support effective personalized learning at scale. Data and code are publicly available. https://github.com/Campus-edu-AI/learning-rate
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_03246
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Personalized AI Practice Replicates Learning Rate Regularity at Scale
Beauchesne, Jocelyn
Maroti, Christine
Bratman, Jeshua
Pesenti, Jerome
Holt, Laurence
Tambellini, Alex
McGrath, Allison
Guo, Matthew
Peterson, Sarah
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Recent research demonstrated that students exhibit consistent learning rates across diverse educational contexts. We test these findings using a dataset of 1.8 million (366k post-filtering) student interactions from the digital platform Campus AI providing further evidence to the observation of regularity in learning rate among students. Unlike prior work requiring manual cognitive modeling, Campus AI automatically generates Knowledge Components (KCs) and corresponding exercises, both of which are validated by human experts. This one-to-many mapping facilitates the application of Additive Factors Models to measure learning parameters without complex cognitive modeling. Using mixed-effects logistic regression, we confirmed the core finding of prior work: students displayed substantial variation in initial knowledge ($\text{IQR} = [2.78, 12.18]$ practice opportunities to reach 80% mastery) but remarkably consistent learning rates ($\text{IQR} = [7.01, 8.25]$ opportunities). Furthermore, students using this fully automated system achieved 80% mastery in a median of 7.22 practice opportunities, comparable to the 6.54 reported for expert-designed curricula. These results suggest that automated, science-grounded content generation can support effective personalized learning at scale. Data and code are publicly available. https://github.com/Campus-edu-AI/learning-rate
title Personalized AI Practice Replicates Learning Rate Regularity at Scale
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03246