Artificial Intelligence and Systemic Risk: A Unified Model of Performative Prediction, Algorithmic Herding, and Cognitive Dependency in Financial Markets

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Shuchen, Chen, Xupeng
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866915914995204096
author Meng, Shuchen
Chen, Xupeng
author_facet Meng, Shuchen
Chen, Xupeng
contents We develop a unified model in which AI adoption in financial markets generates systemic risk through three mutually reinforcing channels: performative prediction, algorithmic herding, and cognitive dependency. Within an extended rational expectations framework with endogenous adoption, we derive an equilibrium systemic risk coupling $r(ϕ) = ϕρβ/λ'(ϕ)$, where $ϕ$ is the AI adoption share, $ρ$ the algorithmic signal correlation, $β$ the performative feedback intensity, and $λ'(ϕ)$ the endogenous effective price impact. Because $λ'(ϕ)$ is decreasing in $ϕ$, the coupling is convex in adoption, implying that the systemic risk multiplier $M = (1 - r)^{-1}$ grows superlinearly as AI penetration increases. The model is developed in three layers. First, endogenous fragility: market depth is decreasing and convex in AI adoption. Second, embedding the convex coupling within a supermodular adoption game produces a saddle-node bifurcation into an algorithmic monoculture. Third, cognitive dependency as an endogenous state variable yields an impossibility theorem (hysteresis requires dynamics beyond static frameworks) and a channel necessity theorem (each channel is individually necessary). Empirical validation uses the complete universe of SEC Form 13F filings (99.5 million holdings, 10,957 institutional managers, 2013--2024) with a Bartik shift-share instrument (first-stage $F = 22.7$). The model implies tail-loss amplification of 18--54%, economically significant relative to Basel III countercyclical buffers.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_03272
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence and Systemic Risk: A Unified Model of Performative Prediction, Algorithmic Herding, and Cognitive Dependency in Financial Markets
Meng, Shuchen
Chen, Xupeng
Computational Finance
Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science and Game Theory
General Finance
We develop a unified model in which AI adoption in financial markets generates systemic risk through three mutually reinforcing channels: performative prediction, algorithmic herding, and cognitive dependency. Within an extended rational expectations framework with endogenous adoption, we derive an equilibrium systemic risk coupling $r(ϕ) = ϕρβ/λ'(ϕ)$, where $ϕ$ is the AI adoption share, $ρ$ the algorithmic signal correlation, $β$ the performative feedback intensity, and $λ'(ϕ)$ the endogenous effective price impact. Because $λ'(ϕ)$ is decreasing in $ϕ$, the coupling is convex in adoption, implying that the systemic risk multiplier $M = (1 - r)^{-1}$ grows superlinearly as AI penetration increases. The model is developed in three layers. First, endogenous fragility: market depth is decreasing and convex in AI adoption. Second, embedding the convex coupling within a supermodular adoption game produces a saddle-node bifurcation into an algorithmic monoculture. Third, cognitive dependency as an endogenous state variable yields an impossibility theorem (hysteresis requires dynamics beyond static frameworks) and a channel necessity theorem (each channel is individually necessary). Empirical validation uses the complete universe of SEC Form 13F filings (99.5 million holdings, 10,957 institutional managers, 2013--2024) with a Bartik shift-share instrument (first-stage $F = 22.7$). The model implies tail-loss amplification of 18--54%, economically significant relative to Basel III countercyclical buffers.
title Artificial Intelligence and Systemic Risk: A Unified Model of Performative Prediction, Algorithmic Herding, and Cognitive Dependency in Financial Markets
topic Computational Finance
Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science and Game Theory
General Finance
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03272