Do Robots Need Body Language? Comparing Communication Modalities for Legible Motion Intent in Human-Shared Spaces
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866915915475451904 |
|---|---|
| author | Cohen, Jonathan Albert Shimizu, Kye Song, Allen Bharath, Vishnu Larson, Kent Maes, Pattie |
| author_facet | Cohen, Jonathan Albert Shimizu, Kye Song, Allen Bharath, Vishnu Larson, Kent Maes, Pattie |
| contents | Robots in shared spaces often move in ways that are difficult for people to interpret, placing the burden on humans to adapt. High-DoF robots exhibit motion that people read as expressive, intentionally or not, making it important to understand how such cues are perceived. We present an online video study evaluating how different signaling modalities, expressive motion, lights, text, and audio, shape people's ability to understand a quadruped robot's upcoming navigation actions (Boston Dynamics Spot). Across four common scenarios, we measure how each modality influences humans' (1) accuracy in predicting the robot's next navigation action, (2) confidence in that prediction, and (3) trust in the robot to act safely. The study tests how expressive motions compare to explicit channels, whether aligned multimodal cues enhance interpretability, and how conflicting cues affect user confidence and trust. We contribute initial evidence on the relative effectiveness of implicit versus explicit signaling strategies. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_03451 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do Robots Need Body Language? Comparing Communication Modalities for Legible Motion Intent in Human-Shared Spaces Cohen, Jonathan Albert Shimizu, Kye Song, Allen Bharath, Vishnu Larson, Kent Maes, Pattie Robotics Computers and Society Human-Computer Interaction Robots in shared spaces often move in ways that are difficult for people to interpret, placing the burden on humans to adapt. High-DoF robots exhibit motion that people read as expressive, intentionally or not, making it important to understand how such cues are perceived. We present an online video study evaluating how different signaling modalities, expressive motion, lights, text, and audio, shape people's ability to understand a quadruped robot's upcoming navigation actions (Boston Dynamics Spot). Across four common scenarios, we measure how each modality influences humans' (1) accuracy in predicting the robot's next navigation action, (2) confidence in that prediction, and (3) trust in the robot to act safely. The study tests how expressive motions compare to explicit channels, whether aligned multimodal cues enhance interpretability, and how conflicting cues affect user confidence and trust. We contribute initial evidence on the relative effectiveness of implicit versus explicit signaling strategies. |
| title | Do Robots Need Body Language? Comparing Communication Modalities for Legible Motion Intent in Human-Shared Spaces |
| topic | Robotics Computers and Society Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03451 |