Quantifying Omitted Variable Bias in Nonlinear Instrumental Variable Estimators

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Yen, Yu-Min
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866908936487043072
author Yen, Yu-Min
author_facet Yen, Yu-Min
contents We develop a framework for quantifying omitted variable bias (OVB) in nonlinear instrumental variable (IV) estimators, including the local average treatment effect (LATE), the LATE for the treated (LATT), and the partially linear IV model (PLIVM). Extending sensitivity analysis beyond linear settings, we derive bias decompositions, establish partial identification bounds, and construct OVB-adjusted confidence intervals. We estimate OVB bounds and conduct inference using double machine learning (DML), allowing flexible control for high-dimensional covariates. An application to the U.S. Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) experiment shows that, at conventional significance levels, first-stage compliance estimates are robust to omitted variables, whereas intention-to-treat and treatment effects are more sensitive. Program impacts are robust and significant for females but fragile for males.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_03544
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Quantifying Omitted Variable Bias in Nonlinear Instrumental Variable Estimators
Yen, Yu-Min
Econometrics
Methodology
We develop a framework for quantifying omitted variable bias (OVB) in nonlinear instrumental variable (IV) estimators, including the local average treatment effect (LATE), the LATE for the treated (LATT), and the partially linear IV model (PLIVM). Extending sensitivity analysis beyond linear settings, we derive bias decompositions, establish partial identification bounds, and construct OVB-adjusted confidence intervals. We estimate OVB bounds and conduct inference using double machine learning (DML), allowing flexible control for high-dimensional covariates. An application to the U.S. Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) experiment shows that, at conventional significance levels, first-stage compliance estimates are robust to omitted variables, whereas intention-to-treat and treatment effects are more sensitive. Program impacts are robust and significant for females but fragile for males.
title Quantifying Omitted Variable Bias in Nonlinear Instrumental Variable Estimators
topic Econometrics
Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03544