LLM-based Listwise Reranking under the Effect of Positional Bias

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiao, Jingfen, Huang, Jin, Ma, Xinyu, Wang, Shuaiqiang, Yin, Dawei, Kanoulas, Evangelos, Yates, Andrew
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911567687188480
author Qiao, Jingfen
Huang, Jin
Ma, Xinyu
Wang, Shuaiqiang
Yin, Dawei
Kanoulas, Evangelos
Yates, Andrew
author_facet Qiao, Jingfen
Huang, Jin
Ma, Xinyu
Wang, Shuaiqiang
Yin, Dawei
Kanoulas, Evangelos
Yates, Andrew
contents LLM-based listwise passage reranking has attracted attention for its effectiveness in ranking candidate passages. However, these models suffer from positional bias, where passages positioned towards the end of the input are less likely to be moved to top positions in the ranking. We hypothesize that there are two primary sources of positional bias: (1) architectural bias inherent in LLMs and (2) the imbalanced positioning of relevant documents. To address this, we propose DebiasFirst, a method that integrates positional calibration and position-aware data augmentation during fine-tuning. Positional calibration uses inverse propensity scoring to adjust for positional bias by re-weighting the contributions of different positions in the loss function when training. Position-aware augmentation augments training data to ensure that each passage appears equally across varied positions in the input list. This approach markedly enhances both effectiveness and robustness to the original ranking across diverse first-stage retrievers, reducing the dependence of NDCG@10 performance on the position of relevant documents. DebiasFirst also complements the inference-stage debiasing methods, offering a practical solution for mitigating positional bias in reranking.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_03642
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle LLM-based Listwise Reranking under the Effect of Positional Bias
Qiao, Jingfen
Huang, Jin
Ma, Xinyu
Wang, Shuaiqiang
Yin, Dawei
Kanoulas, Evangelos
Yates, Andrew
Information Retrieval
LLM-based listwise passage reranking has attracted attention for its effectiveness in ranking candidate passages. However, these models suffer from positional bias, where passages positioned towards the end of the input are less likely to be moved to top positions in the ranking. We hypothesize that there are two primary sources of positional bias: (1) architectural bias inherent in LLMs and (2) the imbalanced positioning of relevant documents. To address this, we propose DebiasFirst, a method that integrates positional calibration and position-aware data augmentation during fine-tuning. Positional calibration uses inverse propensity scoring to adjust for positional bias by re-weighting the contributions of different positions in the loss function when training. Position-aware augmentation augments training data to ensure that each passage appears equally across varied positions in the input list. This approach markedly enhances both effectiveness and robustness to the original ranking across diverse first-stage retrievers, reducing the dependence of NDCG@10 performance on the position of relevant documents. DebiasFirst also complements the inference-stage debiasing methods, offering a practical solution for mitigating positional bias in reranking.
title LLM-based Listwise Reranking under the Effect of Positional Bias
topic Information Retrieval
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03642