OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866911709812228096 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhang, Erhan Chen, Yiqun Niu, Zechun Yang, Wei Wei, Xiaochi Gao, Yan Wu, Yi Hu, Yao Mao, Jiaxin |
| author_facet | Zhang, Erhan Chen, Yiqun Niu, Zechun Yang, Wei Wei, Xiaochi Gao, Yan Wu, Yi Hu, Yao Mao, Jiaxin |
| contents | Agentic search enables language models to solve knowledge-intensive tasks by adaptively acquiring external evidence over multiple steps. Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a widely adopted training paradigm for search agents, yet outcome-only rewards are sparse and provide limited credit assignment for intermediate search actions. Existing process-reward methods therefore seek to densify supervision through proxy signals, external evaluators, or likelihood-based information gain. However, proxy rewards can deviate from the final outcome objective, while fixed evaluators can become stale as the search policy evolves, leading to unreliable process supervision. To address these challenges, we propose OASES, an Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Supervision framework for agentic search. OASES derives outcome-aligned process rewards by evaluating how well each intermediate search state supports answering the original question. It further co-trains the search policy and the state evaluator on policy, allowing the evaluator to adapt to evolving search behavior and provide more reliable process rewards. Experiments on five multi-hop QA benchmarks show that OASES consistently outperforms strong RL baselines, with further analyses confirming the benefits of outcome-aligned process rewards and search-evaluation co-training. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_03675 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search Zhang, Erhan Chen, Yiqun Niu, Zechun Yang, Wei Wei, Xiaochi Gao, Yan Wu, Yi Hu, Yao Mao, Jiaxin Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Information Retrieval Agentic search enables language models to solve knowledge-intensive tasks by adaptively acquiring external evidence over multiple steps. Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a widely adopted training paradigm for search agents, yet outcome-only rewards are sparse and provide limited credit assignment for intermediate search actions. Existing process-reward methods therefore seek to densify supervision through proxy signals, external evaluators, or likelihood-based information gain. However, proxy rewards can deviate from the final outcome objective, while fixed evaluators can become stale as the search policy evolves, leading to unreliable process supervision. To address these challenges, we propose OASES, an Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Supervision framework for agentic search. OASES derives outcome-aligned process rewards by evaluating how well each intermediate search state supports answering the original question. It further co-trains the search policy and the state evaluator on policy, allowing the evaluator to adapt to evolving search behavior and provide more reliable process rewards. Experiments on five multi-hop QA benchmarks show that OASES consistently outperforms strong RL baselines, with further analyses confirming the benefits of outcome-aligned process rewards and search-evaluation co-training. |
| title | OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Information Retrieval |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03675 |