Benchmarking and Evaluating VLMs for Software Architecture Diagram Understanding
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911568398123008 |
|---|---|
| author | Ouyang, Shuyin Zhang, Jie M. Gong, Jingzhi Jahangirova, Gunel Mousavi, Mohammad Reza Johns, Jack Lee, Beum Seuk Ziolkowski, Adam Virginas, Botond Noppen, Joost |
| author_facet | Ouyang, Shuyin Zhang, Jie M. Gong, Jingzhi Jahangirova, Gunel Mousavi, Mohammad Reza Johns, Jack Lee, Beum Seuk Ziolkowski, Adam Virginas, Botond Noppen, Joost |
| contents | Software architecture diagrams are important design artifacts for communicating system structure, behavior, and data organization throughout the software development lifecycle. Although recent progress in large language models has substantially advanced code-centric software engineering tasks such as code generation, testing, and maintenance, the ability of modern vision-language models (VLMs) to understand software architecture diagrams remains underexplored. To address this gap, we present SADU, a benchmark for Software Architecture Diagram Understanding that evaluates VLMs on architecture diagrams as structured software engineering artifacts rather than generic images. SADU contains 154 carefully curated diagrams spanning behavioral, structural, and ER diagrams, paired with structured annotations and 2,431 question-answer tasks covering counting and retrieval reasoning. We evaluate 11 state-of-the-art VLMs from the Gemini, Claude, GPT, and Qwen families.
Our results show that software architecture diagram understanding remains challenging for current models: the best-performing model gemini-3-flash-preview achieves only 70.18\% accuracy, while gpt-4o-mini only achieves 17.77\% accuracy. The results further reveal the weaknesses in diagram reasoning and visual relation grounding, highlighting a gap between current VLMs and the needs of design-stage software engineering. SADU provides a foundation for future research on diagram-aware AI systems and more faithful AI-assisted software engineering workflows. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_04009 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Benchmarking and Evaluating VLMs for Software Architecture Diagram Understanding Ouyang, Shuyin Zhang, Jie M. Gong, Jingzhi Jahangirova, Gunel Mousavi, Mohammad Reza Johns, Jack Lee, Beum Seuk Ziolkowski, Adam Virginas, Botond Noppen, Joost Software Engineering Software architecture diagrams are important design artifacts for communicating system structure, behavior, and data organization throughout the software development lifecycle. Although recent progress in large language models has substantially advanced code-centric software engineering tasks such as code generation, testing, and maintenance, the ability of modern vision-language models (VLMs) to understand software architecture diagrams remains underexplored. To address this gap, we present SADU, a benchmark for Software Architecture Diagram Understanding that evaluates VLMs on architecture diagrams as structured software engineering artifacts rather than generic images. SADU contains 154 carefully curated diagrams spanning behavioral, structural, and ER diagrams, paired with structured annotations and 2,431 question-answer tasks covering counting and retrieval reasoning. We evaluate 11 state-of-the-art VLMs from the Gemini, Claude, GPT, and Qwen families. Our results show that software architecture diagram understanding remains challenging for current models: the best-performing model gemini-3-flash-preview achieves only 70.18\% accuracy, while gpt-4o-mini only achieves 17.77\% accuracy. The results further reveal the weaknesses in diagram reasoning and visual relation grounding, highlighting a gap between current VLMs and the needs of design-stage software engineering. SADU provides a foundation for future research on diagram-aware AI systems and more faithful AI-assisted software engineering workflows. |
| title | Benchmarking and Evaluating VLMs for Software Architecture Diagram Understanding |
| topic | Software Engineering |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04009 |