Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diakonikolas, Ilias, Gao, Chao, Kane, Daniel M., Pensia, Ankit, Xie, Dong
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04228
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917385619898368
author Diakonikolas, Ilias
Gao, Chao
Kane, Daniel M.
Pensia, Ankit
Xie, Dong
author_facet Diakonikolas, Ilias
Gao, Chao
Kane, Daniel M.
Pensia, Ankit
Xie, Dong
contents We study robust regression under a contamination model in which covariates are clean while the responses may be corrupted in an adaptive manner. Unlike the classical Huber's contamination model, where both covariates and responses may be contaminated and consistent estimation is impossible when the contamination proportion is a non-vanishing constant, it turns out that the clean-covariate setting admits strictly improved statistical guarantees. Specifically, we show that the additional information in the clean covariates can be carefully exploited to construct an estimator that achieves a better estimation rate than that attainable under Huber contamination. In contrast to the Huber model, this improved rate implies consistency even when the contamination is a constant. A matching minimax lower bound is established using Fano's inequality together with the construction of contamination processes that match $m> 2$ distributions simultaneously, extending the previous two-point lower bound argument in Huber's setting. Despite the improvement over the Huber model from an information-theoretic perspective, we provide formal evidence -- in the form of Statistical Query and Low-Degree Polynomial lower bounds -- that the problem exhibits strong information-computation gaps. Our results strongly suggest that the information-theoretic improvements cannot be achieved by polynomial-time algorithms, revealing a fundamental gap between information-theoretic and computational limits in robust regression with clean covariates.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_04228
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Robust Regression with Adaptive Contamination in Response: Optimal Rates and Computational Barriers
Diakonikolas, Ilias
Gao, Chao
Kane, Daniel M.
Pensia, Ankit
Xie, Dong
Statistics Theory
Data Structures and Algorithms
Machine Learning
We study robust regression under a contamination model in which covariates are clean while the responses may be corrupted in an adaptive manner. Unlike the classical Huber's contamination model, where both covariates and responses may be contaminated and consistent estimation is impossible when the contamination proportion is a non-vanishing constant, it turns out that the clean-covariate setting admits strictly improved statistical guarantees. Specifically, we show that the additional information in the clean covariates can be carefully exploited to construct an estimator that achieves a better estimation rate than that attainable under Huber contamination. In contrast to the Huber model, this improved rate implies consistency even when the contamination is a constant. A matching minimax lower bound is established using Fano's inequality together with the construction of contamination processes that match $m> 2$ distributions simultaneously, extending the previous two-point lower bound argument in Huber's setting. Despite the improvement over the Huber model from an information-theoretic perspective, we provide formal evidence -- in the form of Statistical Query and Low-Degree Polynomial lower bounds -- that the problem exhibits strong information-computation gaps. Our results strongly suggest that the information-theoretic improvements cannot be achieved by polynomial-time algorithms, revealing a fundamental gap between information-theoretic and computational limits in robust regression with clean covariates.
title Robust Regression with Adaptive Contamination in Response: Optimal Rates and Computational Barriers
topic Statistics Theory
Data Structures and Algorithms
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04228