Relative Density Ratio Optimization for Stable and Statistically Consistent Model Alignment

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Takahashi, Hiroshi, Iwata, Tomoharu, Kumagai, Atsutoshi, Kanai, Sekitoshi, Yamada, Masanori, Nishida, Kosuke, Shinoda, Kazutoshi
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866910105629360128
author Takahashi, Hiroshi
Iwata, Tomoharu
Kumagai, Atsutoshi
Kanai, Sekitoshi
Yamada, Masanori
Nishida, Kosuke
Shinoda, Kazutoshi
author_facet Takahashi, Hiroshi
Iwata, Tomoharu
Kumagai, Atsutoshi
Kanai, Sekitoshi
Yamada, Masanori
Nishida, Kosuke
Shinoda, Kazutoshi
contents Aligning language models with human preferences is essential for ensuring their safety and reliability. Although most existing approaches assume specific human preference models such as the Bradley-Terry model, this assumption may fail to accurately capture true human preferences, and consequently, these methods lack statistical consistency, i.e., the guarantee that language models converge to the true human preference as the number of samples increases. In contrast, direct density ratio optimization (DDRO) achieves statistical consistency without assuming any human preference models. DDRO models the density ratio between preferred and non-preferred data distributions using the language model, and then optimizes it via density ratio estimation. However, this density ratio is unstable and often diverges, leading to training instability of DDRO. In this paper, we propose a novel alignment method that is both stable and statistically consistent. Our approach is based on the relative density ratio between the preferred data distribution and a mixture of the preferred and non-preferred data distributions. Our approach is stable since this relative density ratio is bounded above and does not diverge. Moreover, it is statistically consistent and yields significantly tighter convergence guarantees than DDRO. We experimentally show its effectiveness with Qwen 2.5 and Llama 3.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_04410
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Relative Density Ratio Optimization for Stable and Statistically Consistent Model Alignment
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Iwata, Tomoharu
Kumagai, Atsutoshi
Kanai, Sekitoshi
Yamada, Masanori
Nishida, Kosuke
Shinoda, Kazutoshi
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Aligning language models with human preferences is essential for ensuring their safety and reliability. Although most existing approaches assume specific human preference models such as the Bradley-Terry model, this assumption may fail to accurately capture true human preferences, and consequently, these methods lack statistical consistency, i.e., the guarantee that language models converge to the true human preference as the number of samples increases. In contrast, direct density ratio optimization (DDRO) achieves statistical consistency without assuming any human preference models. DDRO models the density ratio between preferred and non-preferred data distributions using the language model, and then optimizes it via density ratio estimation. However, this density ratio is unstable and often diverges, leading to training instability of DDRO. In this paper, we propose a novel alignment method that is both stable and statistically consistent. Our approach is based on the relative density ratio between the preferred data distribution and a mixture of the preferred and non-preferred data distributions. Our approach is stable since this relative density ratio is bounded above and does not diverge. Moreover, it is statistically consistent and yields significantly tighter convergence guarantees than DDRO. We experimentally show its effectiveness with Qwen 2.5 and Llama 3.
title Relative Density Ratio Optimization for Stable and Statistically Consistent Model Alignment
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04410