AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915917886128128 |
|---|---|
| author | Bandara, Eranga Gunaratna, Asanga Gore, Ross Rahman, Abdul Mukkamala, Ravi Shetty, Sachin Rajapakse, Sachini Kularathna, Isurunima Foytik, Peter Bouk, Safdar H. Liang, Xueping Hass, Amin Keong, Ng Wee De Zoysa, Kasun |
| author_facet | Bandara, Eranga Gunaratna, Asanga Gore, Ross Rahman, Abdul Mukkamala, Ravi Shetty, Sachin Rajapakse, Sachini Kularathna, Isurunima Foytik, Peter Bouk, Safdar H. Liang, Xueping Hass, Amin Keong, Ng Wee De Zoysa, Kasun |
| contents | The accelerating adoption of large language models, retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, and multi-agent AI workflows has created a structural governance crisis. Organizations cannot govern what they cannot see, and existing compliance methodologies built for deterministic web applications provide no mechanism for discovering or continuously validating AI systems that emerge across engineering teams without formal oversight. The result is a widening trust gap between what regulators demand as proof of AI governance maturity and what organizations can demonstrate. This paper proposes AI Trust OS, a governance architecture for continuous, autonomous AI observability and zero-trust compliance. AI Trust OS reconceptualizes compliance as an always-on, telemetry-driven operating layer in which AI systems are discovered through observability signals, control assertions are collected by automated probes, and trust artifacts are synthesized continuously. The framework rests on four principles: proactive discovery, telemetry evidence over manual attestation, continuous posture over point-in-time audit, and architecture-backed proof over policy-document trust. The framework operates through a zero-trust telemetry boundary in which ephemeral read-only probes validate structural metadata without ingressing source code or payload-level PII. An AI Observability Extractor Agent scans LangSmith and Datadog LLM telemetry, automatically registering undocumented AI systems and shifting governance from organizational self-report to empirical machine observation. Evaluated across ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, SOC 2, GDPR, and HIPAA, the paper argues that telemetry-first AI governance represents a categorical architectural shift in how enterprise trust is produced and demonstrated. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_04749 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments Bandara, Eranga Gunaratna, Asanga Gore, Ross Rahman, Abdul Mukkamala, Ravi Shetty, Sachin Rajapakse, Sachini Kularathna, Isurunima Foytik, Peter Bouk, Safdar H. Liang, Xueping Hass, Amin Keong, Ng Wee De Zoysa, Kasun Artificial Intelligence The accelerating adoption of large language models, retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, and multi-agent AI workflows has created a structural governance crisis. Organizations cannot govern what they cannot see, and existing compliance methodologies built for deterministic web applications provide no mechanism for discovering or continuously validating AI systems that emerge across engineering teams without formal oversight. The result is a widening trust gap between what regulators demand as proof of AI governance maturity and what organizations can demonstrate. This paper proposes AI Trust OS, a governance architecture for continuous, autonomous AI observability and zero-trust compliance. AI Trust OS reconceptualizes compliance as an always-on, telemetry-driven operating layer in which AI systems are discovered through observability signals, control assertions are collected by automated probes, and trust artifacts are synthesized continuously. The framework rests on four principles: proactive discovery, telemetry evidence over manual attestation, continuous posture over point-in-time audit, and architecture-backed proof over policy-document trust. The framework operates through a zero-trust telemetry boundary in which ephemeral read-only probes validate structural metadata without ingressing source code or payload-level PII. An AI Observability Extractor Agent scans LangSmith and Datadog LLM telemetry, automatically registering undocumented AI systems and shifting governance from organizational self-report to empirical machine observation. Evaluated across ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, SOC 2, GDPR, and HIPAA, the paper argues that telemetry-first AI governance represents a categorical architectural shift in how enterprise trust is produced and demonstrated. |
| title | AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04749 |