Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peng, Jiaren, Li, Zeqin, You, Chang, Wang, Yan, Sun, Hanlin, Tian, Xuan, Zhang, Shuqiao, Liu, Junyi, Zhao, Jianguo, Liu, Renyang, Ou, Haoran, Sun, Yuqiang, Zhang, Jiancheng, Jiao, Yutong, Song, Kunshu, Zhang, Chao, Shi, Fan, Sun, Hongda, Yan, Rui, Huang, Cheng
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917387952979968
author Peng, Jiaren
Li, Zeqin
You, Chang
Wang, Yan
Sun, Hanlin
Tian, Xuan
Zhang, Shuqiao
Liu, Junyi
Zhao, Jianguo
Liu, Renyang
Ou, Haoran
Sun, Yuqiang
Zhang, Jiancheng
Jiao, Yutong
Song, Kunshu
Zhang, Chao
Shi, Fan
Sun, Hongda
Yan, Rui
Huang, Cheng
author_facet Peng, Jiaren
Li, Zeqin
You, Chang
Wang, Yan
Sun, Hanlin
Tian, Xuan
Zhang, Shuqiao
Liu, Junyi
Zhao, Jianguo
Liu, Renyang
Ou, Haoran
Sun, Yuqiang
Zhang, Jiancheng
Jiao, Yutong
Song, Kunshu
Zhang, Chao
Shi, Fan
Sun, Hongda
Yan, Rui
Huang, Cheng
contents The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created new opportunities for Automated Penetration Testing (AutoPT), spawning numerous frameworks aimed at achieving end-to-end autonomous attacks. However, despite the proliferation of related studies, existing research generally lacks systematic architectural analysis and large-scale empirical comparisons under a unified benchmark. Therefore, this paper presents the first Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) focusing on the architectural design and comprehensive empirical evaluation of current LLM-based AutoPT frameworks. At systematization level, we comprehensively review existing framework designs across six dimensions: agent architecture, agent plan, agent memory, agent execution, external knowledge, and benchmarks. At empirical level, we conduct large-scale experiments on 13 representative open-source AutoPT frameworks and 2 baseline frameworks utilizing a unified benchmark. The experiments consumed over 10 billion tokens in total and generated more than 1,500 execution logs, which were manually reviewed and analyzed over four months by a panel of more than 15 researchers with expertise in cybersecurity. By investigating the latest progress in this rapidly developing field, we provide researchers with a structured taxonomy to understand existing LLM-based AutoPT frameworks and a large-scale empirical benchmark, along with promising directions for future research.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_05719
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing
Peng, Jiaren
Li, Zeqin
You, Chang
Wang, Yan
Sun, Hanlin
Tian, Xuan
Zhang, Shuqiao
Liu, Junyi
Zhao, Jianguo
Liu, Renyang
Ou, Haoran
Sun, Yuqiang
Zhang, Jiancheng
Jiao, Yutong
Song, Kunshu
Zhang, Chao
Shi, Fan
Sun, Hongda
Yan, Rui
Huang, Cheng
Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
Software Engineering
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created new opportunities for Automated Penetration Testing (AutoPT), spawning numerous frameworks aimed at achieving end-to-end autonomous attacks. However, despite the proliferation of related studies, existing research generally lacks systematic architectural analysis and large-scale empirical comparisons under a unified benchmark. Therefore, this paper presents the first Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) focusing on the architectural design and comprehensive empirical evaluation of current LLM-based AutoPT frameworks. At systematization level, we comprehensively review existing framework designs across six dimensions: agent architecture, agent plan, agent memory, agent execution, external knowledge, and benchmarks. At empirical level, we conduct large-scale experiments on 13 representative open-source AutoPT frameworks and 2 baseline frameworks utilizing a unified benchmark. The experiments consumed over 10 billion tokens in total and generated more than 1,500 execution logs, which were manually reviewed and analyzed over four months by a panel of more than 15 researchers with expertise in cybersecurity. By investigating the latest progress in this rapidly developing field, we provide researchers with a structured taxonomy to understand existing LLM-based AutoPT frameworks and a large-scale empirical benchmark, along with promising directions for future research.
title Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing
topic Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05719