Conditional Publics: Shared Events and Divergent Meanings in the European Twitter Debate on the Ukraine War
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915921246814208 |
|---|---|
| author | Monti, Corrado Capozzi, Arthur Mejova, Yelena Morales, Gianmarco De Francisci |
| author_facet | Monti, Corrado Capozzi, Arthur Mejova, Yelena Morales, Gianmarco De Francisci |
| contents | How do European publics debate a geopolitical crisis on social media, and do they inhabit a shared informational reality? We analyze over 38 million geolocated tweets from 20 European countries during the first eight months of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Using retweet community detection and stance annotation across six issues, we identify 'hawkish' and 'doveish' opinion clusters present within almost every country studied. We find that structural polarization is driven not by radicalization, but by the exit of casual users. Crucially, whether opposing sides orient to the same events depends on the issue. On pragmatist issues, both sides react to the same high-profile events, forming an agonistic public sphere. Instead, on interpretive issues, they operate as affective publics and counterpublics constructing divergent meanings. We propose conditional publics to describe formations whose relational structure, sharing or fracturing a referential frame, depends on the epistemic character of the debated issue. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_05800 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Conditional Publics: Shared Events and Divergent Meanings in the European Twitter Debate on the Ukraine War Monti, Corrado Capozzi, Arthur Mejova, Yelena Morales, Gianmarco De Francisci Computers and Society Social and Information Networks How do European publics debate a geopolitical crisis on social media, and do they inhabit a shared informational reality? We analyze over 38 million geolocated tweets from 20 European countries during the first eight months of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Using retweet community detection and stance annotation across six issues, we identify 'hawkish' and 'doveish' opinion clusters present within almost every country studied. We find that structural polarization is driven not by radicalization, but by the exit of casual users. Crucially, whether opposing sides orient to the same events depends on the issue. On pragmatist issues, both sides react to the same high-profile events, forming an agonistic public sphere. Instead, on interpretive issues, they operate as affective publics and counterpublics constructing divergent meanings. We propose conditional publics to describe formations whose relational structure, sharing or fracturing a referential frame, depends on the epistemic character of the debated issue. |
| title | Conditional Publics: Shared Events and Divergent Meanings in the European Twitter Debate on the Ukraine War |
| topic | Computers and Society Social and Information Networks |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05800 |