Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Zhou, Hongxu
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06066
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866918432511885312
author Zhou, Hongxu
author_facet Zhou, Hongxu
contents Intrinsic self-correction in Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently fails in open-ended reasoning tasks due to ``hallucination snowballing,'' a phenomenon in which models recursively justify early errors during free-text reflection. While structured feedback can mitigate this issue, existing approaches often rely on externally trained critics or symbolic tools, reducing agent autonomy. This study investigates whether enforcing structured reflection purely through Outlines-based constrained decoding can disrupt error propagation without additional training. Evaluating an 8-billion-parameter model (Qwen3-8B), we show that simply imposing structural constraints does not improve self-correction performance. Instead, it triggers a new failure mode termed ``structure snowballing.'' We find that the cognitive load required to satisfy strict formatting rules pushes the model into formatting traps. This observation helps explain why the agent achieves near-perfect superficial syntactic alignment yet fails to detect or resolve deeper semantic errors. These findings expose an ``alignment tax'' inherent to constrained decoding, highlighting a tension between structural granularity and internal model capacity in autonomous workflows. Code and raw logs are available in the GitHub repository: https://github.com/hongxuzhou/agentic_llm_structured_self_critique.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_06066
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle From Hallucination to Structure Snowballing: The Alignment Tax of Constrained Decoding in LLM Reflection
Zhou, Hongxu
Computation and Language
Intrinsic self-correction in Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently fails in open-ended reasoning tasks due to ``hallucination snowballing,'' a phenomenon in which models recursively justify early errors during free-text reflection. While structured feedback can mitigate this issue, existing approaches often rely on externally trained critics or symbolic tools, reducing agent autonomy. This study investigates whether enforcing structured reflection purely through Outlines-based constrained decoding can disrupt error propagation without additional training. Evaluating an 8-billion-parameter model (Qwen3-8B), we show that simply imposing structural constraints does not improve self-correction performance. Instead, it triggers a new failure mode termed ``structure snowballing.'' We find that the cognitive load required to satisfy strict formatting rules pushes the model into formatting traps. This observation helps explain why the agent achieves near-perfect superficial syntactic alignment yet fails to detect or resolve deeper semantic errors. These findings expose an ``alignment tax'' inherent to constrained decoding, highlighting a tension between structural granularity and internal model capacity in autonomous workflows. Code and raw logs are available in the GitHub repository: https://github.com/hongxuzhou/agentic_llm_structured_self_critique.
title From Hallucination to Structure Snowballing: The Alignment Tax of Constrained Decoding in LLM Reflection
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06066