"Help Me, But Don't Track Me": Intervention Timing and Privacy Boundaries for Process-Aware AI Tutors

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Li, Jane Hanqi, Zhang, Yuhong, Liu, Jiaqi, Jung, Tzyy-Ping, Eguchi, Amy
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866915973040177152
author Li, Jane Hanqi
Zhang, Yuhong
Liu, Jiaqi
Jung, Tzyy-Ping
Eguchi, Amy
author_facet Li, Jane Hanqi
Zhang, Yuhong
Liu, Jiaqi
Jung, Tzyy-Ping
Eguchi, Amy
contents As generative AI (GenAI) tools are increasingly used as informal tutors for mathematics learning, future systems may become more proactive and process-aware in deciding when and how to offer support. Yet such support raises an important design tension: help that is timely may also feel interruptive or overly monitoring. To inform the design of process-aware AI tutors, we surveyed 330 secondary school students in China (Grades 7--11) about their preferred tutoring behaviors, attitudes toward proactive intervention, and acceptable use of learning-process data. We found three design-relevant patterns. First, students preferred autonomy-preserving support, such as hints over direct answers. Second, they favored graduated proactive support over constant interruption, preferring small hints first and stronger assistance only as needed. Third, they drew clear privacy boundaries around learning-process data: students were comfortable with problem-solving steps and mistake patterns, but substantially less comfortable with attention- or behavior-related signals. Together, these findings offer early empirical guidance for designing AI tutors that balance timely support with learner agency, and personalization with perceived privacy boundaries in K-12 contexts.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_06178
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle "Help Me, But Don't Track Me": Intervention Timing and Privacy Boundaries for Process-Aware AI Tutors
Li, Jane Hanqi
Zhang, Yuhong
Liu, Jiaqi
Jung, Tzyy-Ping
Eguchi, Amy
Human-Computer Interaction
As generative AI (GenAI) tools are increasingly used as informal tutors for mathematics learning, future systems may become more proactive and process-aware in deciding when and how to offer support. Yet such support raises an important design tension: help that is timely may also feel interruptive or overly monitoring. To inform the design of process-aware AI tutors, we surveyed 330 secondary school students in China (Grades 7--11) about their preferred tutoring behaviors, attitudes toward proactive intervention, and acceptable use of learning-process data. We found three design-relevant patterns. First, students preferred autonomy-preserving support, such as hints over direct answers. Second, they favored graduated proactive support over constant interruption, preferring small hints first and stronger assistance only as needed. Third, they drew clear privacy boundaries around learning-process data: students were comfortable with problem-solving steps and mistake patterns, but substantially less comfortable with attention- or behavior-related signals. Together, these findings offer early empirical guidance for designing AI tutors that balance timely support with learner agency, and personalization with perceived privacy boundaries in K-12 contexts.
title "Help Me, But Don't Track Me": Intervention Timing and Privacy Boundaries for Process-Aware AI Tutors
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06178