Language Bias under Conflicting Information in Multilingual LLMs
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914458252607488 |
|---|---|
| author | Östling, Robert Kurfalı, Murathan |
| author_facet | Östling, Robert Kurfalı, Murathan |
| contents | Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to contain biases in the process of integrating conflicting information when answering questions. Here we ask whether such biases also exist with respect to which language is used for each conflicting piece of information. To answer this question, we extend the conflicting needles in a haystack paradigm to a multilingual setting and perform a comprehensive set of evaluations with naturalistic news domain data in five different languages, for a range of multilingual LLMs of different sizes. We find that all LLMs tested, including GPT-5.2, ignore the conflict and confidently assert only one of the possible answers in the large majority of cases. Furthermore, there is a consistent bias across models in which languages are preferred, with a general bias against Russian and, for the longest context lengths, in favor of Chinese. Both of these patterns are consistent between models trained inside and outside of mainland China, though somewhat stronger in the former category. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_07123 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Language Bias under Conflicting Information in Multilingual LLMs Östling, Robert Kurfalı, Murathan Computation and Language Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to contain biases in the process of integrating conflicting information when answering questions. Here we ask whether such biases also exist with respect to which language is used for each conflicting piece of information. To answer this question, we extend the conflicting needles in a haystack paradigm to a multilingual setting and perform a comprehensive set of evaluations with naturalistic news domain data in five different languages, for a range of multilingual LLMs of different sizes. We find that all LLMs tested, including GPT-5.2, ignore the conflict and confidently assert only one of the possible answers in the large majority of cases. Furthermore, there is a consistent bias across models in which languages are preferred, with a general bias against Russian and, for the longest context lengths, in favor of Chinese. Both of these patterns are consistent between models trained inside and outside of mainland China, though somewhat stronger in the former category. |
| title | Language Bias under Conflicting Information in Multilingual LLMs |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07123 |