Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08281 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914481695621120 |
|---|---|
| author | Xu, Ruotao Ji, Yixin Luo, Yu Li, Jinpeng Li, Dong Li, Peifeng Li, Juntao Zhang, Min |
| author_facet | Xu, Ruotao Ji, Yixin Luo, Yu Li, Jinpeng Li, Dong Li, Peifeng Li, Juntao Zhang, Min |
| contents | Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved strong performance enhancement through scaling test time computation, but due to the inherent limitations of the underlying language models, they still have shortcomings in tasks that require precise computation and extensive knowledge reserves. Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) has emerged as a promising paradigm that incorporates tool call and execution within the reasoning trajectory. Although recent works have released some powerful open-source TIR models, our analysis reveals that these models still suffer from critical deficiencies. We find that when the reasoning of the model conflicts with the tool results, the model tends to believe in its own reasoning. And there are cases where the tool results are correct but are ignored by the model, resulting in incorrect answers, which we define as "Tool Ignored''. This indicates that the model does not know when to trust or ignore the tool. To overcome these limitations, We introduce Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration (ATTC), a novel framework that guides the model to adaptively choose to trust or ignore the tool results based on the confidence score of generated code blocks. The experimental results from various open-source TIR models of different sizes and across multiple datasets demonstrate that ATTC effectively reduces the "Tool Ignored" issue, resulting in a performance increase of 4.1% to 7.5%. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_08281 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | When to Trust Tools? Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration For Tool-Integrated Math Reasoning Xu, Ruotao Ji, Yixin Luo, Yu Li, Jinpeng Li, Dong Li, Peifeng Li, Juntao Zhang, Min Computation and Language Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved strong performance enhancement through scaling test time computation, but due to the inherent limitations of the underlying language models, they still have shortcomings in tasks that require precise computation and extensive knowledge reserves. Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) has emerged as a promising paradigm that incorporates tool call and execution within the reasoning trajectory. Although recent works have released some powerful open-source TIR models, our analysis reveals that these models still suffer from critical deficiencies. We find that when the reasoning of the model conflicts with the tool results, the model tends to believe in its own reasoning. And there are cases where the tool results are correct but are ignored by the model, resulting in incorrect answers, which we define as "Tool Ignored''. This indicates that the model does not know when to trust or ignore the tool. To overcome these limitations, We introduce Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration (ATTC), a novel framework that guides the model to adaptively choose to trust or ignore the tool results based on the confidence score of generated code blocks. The experimental results from various open-source TIR models of different sizes and across multiple datasets demonstrate that ATTC effectively reduces the "Tool Ignored" issue, resulting in a performance increase of 4.1% to 7.5%. |
| title | When to Trust Tools? Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration For Tool-Integrated Math Reasoning |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08281 |