Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Jiawei, Xu, Ruoxi, Cao, Boxi, Pan, Ruotong, Zhang, Yunfei, Hu, Yifei, Du, Yong, Gao, Tingting, Lu, Yaojie, Sun, Yingfei, Han, Xianpei, Sun, Le, Wu, Xiangyu, Lin, Hongyu
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08362
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917518725087232
author Chen, Jiawei
Xu, Ruoxi
Cao, Boxi
Pan, Ruotong
Zhang, Yunfei
Hu, Yifei
Du, Yong
Gao, Tingting
Lu, Yaojie
Sun, Yingfei
Han, Xianpei
Sun, Le
Wu, Xiangyu
Lin, Hongyu
author_facet Chen, Jiawei
Xu, Ruoxi
Cao, Boxi
Pan, Ruotong
Zhang, Yunfei
Hu, Yifei
Du, Yong
Gao, Tingting
Lu, Yaojie
Sun, Yingfei
Han, Xianpei
Sun, Le
Wu, Xiangyu
Lin, Hongyu
contents The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has illuminated the potential for a general-purpose user simulator. However, existing benchmarks remain constrained to isolated scenarios, narrow action spaces, or synthetic data, failing to capture the holistic nature of authentic human behavior. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniBehavior, the first user simulation benchmark constructed entirely from real-world data, integrating long-horizon, cross-scenario, and heterogeneous behavioral patterns into a unified framework. Based on this benchmark, we first provide empirical evidence that previous datasets with isolated scenarios suffer from tunnel vision, whereas real-world decision-making relies on long-term, cross-scenario causal chains. Extensive evaluations of state-of-the-art LLMs reveal that current models struggle to accurately simulate these complex behaviors, with performance plateauing even as context windows expand. Crucially, a systematic comparison between simulated and authentic behaviors uncovers a fundamental structural bias: LLMs tend to converge toward a positive average person, exhibiting hyper-activity, persona homogenization, and a utopian bias. This results in the loss of individual differences and long-tail behaviors, highlighting critical directions for future high-fidelity simulation research.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_08362
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Towards Real-world Human Behavior Simulation: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Long-horizon, Cross-scenario, Heterogeneous Behavior Traces
Chen, Jiawei
Xu, Ruoxi
Cao, Boxi
Pan, Ruotong
Zhang, Yunfei
Hu, Yifei
Du, Yong
Gao, Tingting
Lu, Yaojie
Sun, Yingfei
Han, Xianpei
Sun, Le
Wu, Xiangyu
Lin, Hongyu
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has illuminated the potential for a general-purpose user simulator. However, existing benchmarks remain constrained to isolated scenarios, narrow action spaces, or synthetic data, failing to capture the holistic nature of authentic human behavior. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniBehavior, the first user simulation benchmark constructed entirely from real-world data, integrating long-horizon, cross-scenario, and heterogeneous behavioral patterns into a unified framework. Based on this benchmark, we first provide empirical evidence that previous datasets with isolated scenarios suffer from tunnel vision, whereas real-world decision-making relies on long-term, cross-scenario causal chains. Extensive evaluations of state-of-the-art LLMs reveal that current models struggle to accurately simulate these complex behaviors, with performance plateauing even as context windows expand. Crucially, a systematic comparison between simulated and authentic behaviors uncovers a fundamental structural bias: LLMs tend to converge toward a positive average person, exhibiting hyper-activity, persona homogenization, and a utopian bias. This results in the loss of individual differences and long-tail behaviors, highlighting critical directions for future high-fidelity simulation research.
title Towards Real-world Human Behavior Simulation: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Long-horizon, Cross-scenario, Heterogeneous Behavior Traces
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08362