Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicholson, Maximilian
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09696
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913022154375168
author Nicholson, Maximilian
author_facet Nicholson, Maximilian
contents Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are a natural computational model for on-sensor and near-sensor vision, where event driven processors must operate under strict power budgets with hard binary spikes. However, models trained with surrogate gradients often degrade sharply when the smooth surrogate nonlinearity is replaced by a hard threshold at deployment; a surrogate-to-hard transfer gap that directly limits on-sensor accuracy. We study Sharpness-Aware Surrogate Training (SAST), which applies Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) to a surrogate-forward SNN so that the training objective is smooth and the gradient is exact, and position it as one gap-reduction strategy under the tested settings rather than the only viable mechanism. Under explicit contraction assumptions we provide state-stability, input-Lipschitz, and smoothness bounds, together with a corresponding nonconvex convergence result. On two event-camera benchmarks, swap-only hard-spike accuracy improves from 65.7\% to 94.7\% on N-MNIST and from 31.8\% to 63.3\% on DVS Gesture. Under a hardware-aware inference simulation (INT8/INT4 weight quantization, fixed-point membrane potentials, discrete leak factors), SAST remains strong: on N-MNIST, hard-spike accuracy improves from 47.6\% to 96.9\% (INT8) and from 43.2\% to 81.0\% (INT4), while on DVS Gesture it improves from 25.3\% to 47.6\% (INT8) and from 26.0\% to 43.8\% (INT4). SynOps also decrease under the same hardware-aware setting, including 1734k$\rightarrow$1315k (N-MNIST, INT8) and 86221k$\rightarrow$4323k (DVS Gesture, INT8). These results suggest that SAST is a promising component in a broader toolbox for on-sensor spiking inference under the tested settings.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_09696
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Sharpness-Aware Surrogate Training for On-Sensor Spiking Neural Networks
Nicholson, Maximilian
Neural and Evolutionary Computing
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Machine Learning
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are a natural computational model for on-sensor and near-sensor vision, where event driven processors must operate under strict power budgets with hard binary spikes. However, models trained with surrogate gradients often degrade sharply when the smooth surrogate nonlinearity is replaced by a hard threshold at deployment; a surrogate-to-hard transfer gap that directly limits on-sensor accuracy. We study Sharpness-Aware Surrogate Training (SAST), which applies Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) to a surrogate-forward SNN so that the training objective is smooth and the gradient is exact, and position it as one gap-reduction strategy under the tested settings rather than the only viable mechanism. Under explicit contraction assumptions we provide state-stability, input-Lipschitz, and smoothness bounds, together with a corresponding nonconvex convergence result. On two event-camera benchmarks, swap-only hard-spike accuracy improves from 65.7\% to 94.7\% on N-MNIST and from 31.8\% to 63.3\% on DVS Gesture. Under a hardware-aware inference simulation (INT8/INT4 weight quantization, fixed-point membrane potentials, discrete leak factors), SAST remains strong: on N-MNIST, hard-spike accuracy improves from 47.6\% to 96.9\% (INT8) and from 43.2\% to 81.0\% (INT4), while on DVS Gesture it improves from 25.3\% to 47.6\% (INT8) and from 26.0\% to 43.8\% (INT4). SynOps also decrease under the same hardware-aware setting, including 1734k$\rightarrow$1315k (N-MNIST, INT8) and 86221k$\rightarrow$4323k (DVS Gesture, INT8). These results suggest that SAST is a promising component in a broader toolbox for on-sensor spiking inference under the tested settings.
title Sharpness-Aware Surrogate Training for On-Sensor Spiking Neural Networks
topic Neural and Evolutionary Computing
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09696