Do vision models perceive illusory motion in static images like humans?
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908963937714176 |
|---|---|
| author | Rosario, Isabella Elaine Cheng, Fan L. Sun, Zitang Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus |
| author_facet | Rosario, Isabella Elaine Cheng, Fan L. Sun, Zitang Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus |
| contents | Understanding human motion processing is essential for building reliable, human-centered computer vision systems. Although deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve strong performance in optical flow estimation, they remain less robust than humans and rely on fundamentally different computational strategies. Visual motion illusions provide a powerful probe into these mechanisms, revealing how human and machine vision align or diverge. While recent DNN-based motion models can reproduce dynamic illusions such as reverse-phi, it remains unclear whether they can perceive illusory motion in static images, exemplified by the Rotating Snakes illusion. We evaluate several representative optical flow models on Rotating Snakes and show that most fail to generate flow fields consistent with human perception. Under simulated conditions mimicking saccadic eye movements, only the human-inspired Dual-Channel model exhibits the expected rotational motion, with the closest correspondence emerging during the saccade simulation. Ablation analyses further reveal that both luminance-based and higher-order color--feature--based motion signals contribute to this behavior and that a recurrent attention mechanism is critical for integrating local cues. Our results highlight a substantial gap between current optical-flow models and human visual motion processing, and offer insights for developing future motion-estimation systems with improved correspondence to human perception and human-centric AI. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_09853 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do vision models perceive illusory motion in static images like humans? Rosario, Isabella Elaine Cheng, Fan L. Sun, Zitang Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Understanding human motion processing is essential for building reliable, human-centered computer vision systems. Although deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve strong performance in optical flow estimation, they remain less robust than humans and rely on fundamentally different computational strategies. Visual motion illusions provide a powerful probe into these mechanisms, revealing how human and machine vision align or diverge. While recent DNN-based motion models can reproduce dynamic illusions such as reverse-phi, it remains unclear whether they can perceive illusory motion in static images, exemplified by the Rotating Snakes illusion. We evaluate several representative optical flow models on Rotating Snakes and show that most fail to generate flow fields consistent with human perception. Under simulated conditions mimicking saccadic eye movements, only the human-inspired Dual-Channel model exhibits the expected rotational motion, with the closest correspondence emerging during the saccade simulation. Ablation analyses further reveal that both luminance-based and higher-order color--feature--based motion signals contribute to this behavior and that a recurrent attention mechanism is critical for integrating local cues. Our results highlight a substantial gap between current optical-flow models and human visual motion processing, and offer insights for developing future motion-estimation systems with improved correspondence to human perception and human-centric AI. |
| title | Do vision models perceive illusory motion in static images like humans? |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09853 |