FinTrace: Holistic Trajectory-Level Evaluation of LLM Tool Calling for Long-Horizon Financial Tasks

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Cao, Yupeng, Li, Haohang, Liu, Weijin, Cao, Wenbo, Xu, Anke, Qian, Lingfei, Peng, Xueqing, Tang, Minxue, Yao, Zhiyuan, Huang, Jimin, Subbalakshmi, K. P., Zhu, Zining, Suchow, Jordan W., Yu, Yangyang
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866911595160928256
author Cao, Yupeng
Li, Haohang
Liu, Weijin
Cao, Wenbo
Xu, Anke
Qian, Lingfei
Peng, Xueqing
Tang, Minxue
Yao, Zhiyuan
Huang, Jimin
Subbalakshmi, K. P.
Zhu, Zining
Suchow, Jordan W.
Yu, Yangyang
author_facet Cao, Yupeng
Li, Haohang
Liu, Weijin
Cao, Wenbo
Xu, Anke
Qian, Lingfei
Peng, Xueqing
Tang, Minxue
Yao, Zhiyuan
Huang, Jimin
Subbalakshmi, K. P.
Zhu, Zining
Suchow, Jordan W.
Yu, Yangyang
contents Recent studies demonstrate that tool-calling capability enables large language models (LLMs) to interact with external environments for long-horizon financial tasks. While existing benchmarks have begun evaluating financial tool calling, they focus on limited scenarios and rely on call-level metrics that fail to capture trajectory-level reasoning quality. To address this gap, we introduce FinTrace, a benchmark comprising 800 expert-annotated trajectories spanning 34 real-world financial task categories across multiple difficulty levels. FinTrace employs a rubric-based evaluation protocol with nine metrics organized along four axes -- action correctness, execution efficiency, process quality, and output quality -- enabling fine-grained assessment of LLM tool-calling behavior. Our evaluation of 13 LLMs reveals that while frontier models achieve strong tool selection, all models struggle with information utilization and final answer quality, exposing a critical gap between invoking the right tools and reasoning effectively over their outputs. To move beyond diagnosis, we construct FinTrace-Training, the first trajectory-level preference dataset for financial tool-calling, containing 8,196 curated trajectories with tool-augmented contexts and preference pairs. We fine-tune Qwen-3.5-9B using supervised fine-tuning followed by direct preference optimization (DPO) and show that training on FinTrace-Training consistently improves intermediate reasoning metrics, with DPO more effectively suppressing failure modes. However, end-to-end answer quality remains a bottleneck, indicating that trajectory-level improvements do not yet fully propagate to final output quality.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_10015
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle FinTrace: Holistic Trajectory-Level Evaluation of LLM Tool Calling for Long-Horizon Financial Tasks
Cao, Yupeng
Li, Haohang
Liu, Weijin
Cao, Wenbo
Xu, Anke
Qian, Lingfei
Peng, Xueqing
Tang, Minxue
Yao, Zhiyuan
Huang, Jimin
Subbalakshmi, K. P.
Zhu, Zining
Suchow, Jordan W.
Yu, Yangyang
Artificial Intelligence
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
Computation and Language
Multimedia
Recent studies demonstrate that tool-calling capability enables large language models (LLMs) to interact with external environments for long-horizon financial tasks. While existing benchmarks have begun evaluating financial tool calling, they focus on limited scenarios and rely on call-level metrics that fail to capture trajectory-level reasoning quality. To address this gap, we introduce FinTrace, a benchmark comprising 800 expert-annotated trajectories spanning 34 real-world financial task categories across multiple difficulty levels. FinTrace employs a rubric-based evaluation protocol with nine metrics organized along four axes -- action correctness, execution efficiency, process quality, and output quality -- enabling fine-grained assessment of LLM tool-calling behavior. Our evaluation of 13 LLMs reveals that while frontier models achieve strong tool selection, all models struggle with information utilization and final answer quality, exposing a critical gap between invoking the right tools and reasoning effectively over their outputs. To move beyond diagnosis, we construct FinTrace-Training, the first trajectory-level preference dataset for financial tool-calling, containing 8,196 curated trajectories with tool-augmented contexts and preference pairs. We fine-tune Qwen-3.5-9B using supervised fine-tuning followed by direct preference optimization (DPO) and show that training on FinTrace-Training consistently improves intermediate reasoning metrics, with DPO more effectively suppressing failure modes. However, end-to-end answer quality remains a bottleneck, indicating that trajectory-level improvements do not yet fully propagate to final output quality.
title FinTrace: Holistic Trajectory-Level Evaluation of LLM Tool Calling for Long-Horizon Financial Tasks
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
Computation and Language
Multimedia
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10015