Exploring Radiologists' Expectations of Explainable Machine Learning Models in Medical Image Analysis
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915934920245248 |
|---|---|
| author | Ketabi, Sara Wagner, Matthias W. Ertl-Wagner, Birgit Betina Jamieson, Greg A. Khalvati, Farzad |
| author_facet | Ketabi, Sara Wagner, Matthias W. Ertl-Wagner, Birgit Betina Jamieson, Greg A. Khalvati, Farzad |
| contents | In spite of the strong performance of machine learning (ML) models in radiology, they have not been widely accepted by radiologists, limiting clinical integration. A key reason is the lack of explainability, which ensures that model predictions are understandable and verifiable by clinicians. Several methods and tools have been proposed to improve explainability, but most reflect developers' perspectives and lack systematic clinical validation. In this work, we gathered insights from radiologists with varying experience and specialties into explainable ML requirements through a structured questionnaire. They also highlighted key clinical tasks where ML could be most beneficial and how it might be deployed. Based on their input, we propose guidelines for designing and developing explainable ML models in radiology. These guidelines can help researchers develop clinically useful models, facilitating integration into radiology practice as a supportive tool. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_11700 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Exploring Radiologists' Expectations of Explainable Machine Learning Models in Medical Image Analysis Ketabi, Sara Wagner, Matthias W. Ertl-Wagner, Birgit Betina Jamieson, Greg A. Khalvati, Farzad Human-Computer Interaction In spite of the strong performance of machine learning (ML) models in radiology, they have not been widely accepted by radiologists, limiting clinical integration. A key reason is the lack of explainability, which ensures that model predictions are understandable and verifiable by clinicians. Several methods and tools have been proposed to improve explainability, but most reflect developers' perspectives and lack systematic clinical validation. In this work, we gathered insights from radiologists with varying experience and specialties into explainable ML requirements through a structured questionnaire. They also highlighted key clinical tasks where ML could be most beneficial and how it might be deployed. Based on their input, we propose guidelines for designing and developing explainable ML models in radiology. These guidelines can help researchers develop clinically useful models, facilitating integration into radiology practice as a supportive tool. |
| title | Exploring Radiologists' Expectations of Explainable Machine Learning Models in Medical Image Analysis |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11700 |