Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11724 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908960288669696 |
|---|---|
| author | Hoenen, Armin |
| author_facet | Hoenen, Armin |
| contents | The age of artificial intelligence has brought many new possibilities and pitfalls in many fields and tasks. The devil is in the details, and those come to the fore when building new pipelines and executing small practical experiments. OCR and stemmatology are no exception. The current investigation starts comparing a range of OCR-systems, from classical over machine learning to LLMs, for roughly 6,000 characters of late handwritten church slavonic manuscripts from the 18th century. Focussing on basic letter correctness, more than 10 CS OCR-systems among which 2 LLMs (GPT5 and Gemini3-flash) are being compared. Then, post-processing via LLMs is assessed and finally, different agentic OCR architectures (specialized post-processing agents, an agentic pipeline and RAG) are tested. With new technology elaborated, experiments suggest, church slavonic CER for basic letters may reach as low as 2-3% but elaborated diacritics could still present a problem. How well OCR can prime stemmatology as a downstream task is the entry point to the second part of the article which introduces a new stemmatic method based solely on image processing. Here, a pipeline of automated visual glyph extraction, clustering and pairwise statistical comparison leading to a distance matrix and ultimately a stemma, is being presented and applied to two small corpora, one for the church slavonic Gospel of Mark from the 14th to 16th centuries, one for the Roman de la Rose in French from the 14th and 15th centuries. Basic functioning of the method can be demonstrated. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_11724 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The Devil is in the Details -- From OCR for Old Church Slavonic to Purely Visual Stemma Reconstruction Hoenen, Armin Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition The age of artificial intelligence has brought many new possibilities and pitfalls in many fields and tasks. The devil is in the details, and those come to the fore when building new pipelines and executing small practical experiments. OCR and stemmatology are no exception. The current investigation starts comparing a range of OCR-systems, from classical over machine learning to LLMs, for roughly 6,000 characters of late handwritten church slavonic manuscripts from the 18th century. Focussing on basic letter correctness, more than 10 CS OCR-systems among which 2 LLMs (GPT5 and Gemini3-flash) are being compared. Then, post-processing via LLMs is assessed and finally, different agentic OCR architectures (specialized post-processing agents, an agentic pipeline and RAG) are tested. With new technology elaborated, experiments suggest, church slavonic CER for basic letters may reach as low as 2-3% but elaborated diacritics could still present a problem. How well OCR can prime stemmatology as a downstream task is the entry point to the second part of the article which introduces a new stemmatic method based solely on image processing. Here, a pipeline of automated visual glyph extraction, clustering and pairwise statistical comparison leading to a distance matrix and ultimately a stemma, is being presented and applied to two small corpora, one for the church slavonic Gospel of Mark from the 14th to 16th centuries, one for the Roman de la Rose in French from the 14th and 15th centuries. Basic functioning of the method can be demonstrated. |
| title | The Devil is in the Details -- From OCR for Old Church Slavonic to Purely Visual Stemma Reconstruction |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11724 |