Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Long, Xiang, Du, Li, Xu, Yilong, Liu, Fangcheng, Wang, Haoqing, Ding, Ning, Li, Ziheng, Guo, Jianyuan, Tang, Yehui
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13072
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917409329250304
author Long, Xiang
Du, Li
Xu, Yilong
Liu, Fangcheng
Wang, Haoqing
Ding, Ning
Li, Ziheng
Guo, Jianyuan
Tang, Yehui
author_facet Long, Xiang
Du, Li
Xu, Yilong
Liu, Fangcheng
Wang, Haoqing
Ding, Ning
Li, Ziheng
Guo, Jianyuan
Tang, Yehui
contents LLM-based agents are increasingly expected to handle real-world assistant tasks, yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate them under isolated sources of difficulty, such as a single environment or fully specified instructions. This leaves a substantial gap between current evaluation settings and the compositional challenges that arise in practical deployment. To address this gap, we introduce LiveClawBench, a benchmark to evaluate LLM agents on real-world assistant tasks. Based on an analysis of various real OpenClaw usage cases, we derive a Triple-Axis Complexity Framework that characterizes task difficulty along three dimensions: Environment Complexity, Cognitive Demand, and Runtime Adaptability. Guided by this framework, we construct a pilot benchmark with explicit complexity-factor annotations, covering real-world assistant tasks with compositional difficulty. Together, the framework and benchmark provide a principled foundation for evaluating LLM agents in realistic assistant settings, and establish a basis for future expansion across task domains and complexity axes. We are continuing to enrich our case collections to achieve more comprehensive domain and complexity coverage. The project page is at https://github.com/Mosi-AI/LiveClawBench.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_13072
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks
Long, Xiang
Du, Li
Xu, Yilong
Liu, Fangcheng
Wang, Haoqing
Ding, Ning
Li, Ziheng
Guo, Jianyuan
Tang, Yehui
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
LLM-based agents are increasingly expected to handle real-world assistant tasks, yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate them under isolated sources of difficulty, such as a single environment or fully specified instructions. This leaves a substantial gap between current evaluation settings and the compositional challenges that arise in practical deployment. To address this gap, we introduce LiveClawBench, a benchmark to evaluate LLM agents on real-world assistant tasks. Based on an analysis of various real OpenClaw usage cases, we derive a Triple-Axis Complexity Framework that characterizes task difficulty along three dimensions: Environment Complexity, Cognitive Demand, and Runtime Adaptability. Guided by this framework, we construct a pilot benchmark with explicit complexity-factor annotations, covering real-world assistant tasks with compositional difficulty. Together, the framework and benchmark provide a principled foundation for evaluating LLM agents in realistic assistant settings, and establish a basis for future expansion across task domains and complexity axes. We are continuing to enrich our case collections to achieve more comprehensive domain and complexity coverage. The project page is at https://github.com/Mosi-AI/LiveClawBench.
title LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13072