Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13109 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866917409356513280 |
|---|---|
| author | Suwannik, Worasait |
| author_facet | Suwannik, Worasait |
| contents | We present a two-stage pipeline for AI-assisted improvement of published algorithm implementations. In the first stage, a large language model with research capabilities identifies recently published algorithms satisfying explicit experimental criteria. In the second stage, Claude Code is given a prompt to reproduce the reported baseline and then iterate an improvement process. We apply this pipeline to published algorithm implementations spanning multiple research domains. Claude Code reported that all eleven experiments yielded improvements. Each improvement could be achieved within a single working day. We analyse the human contributions that remain indispensable, including selecting the target, verifying experimental validity, assessing novelty and impact, providing computational resources, and writing with appropriate AI-use disclosure. Finally, we discuss implications for peer review and academic publishing. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_13109 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Applying an Agentic Coding Tool for Improving Published Algorithm Implementations Suwannik, Worasait Software Engineering Artificial Intelligence We present a two-stage pipeline for AI-assisted improvement of published algorithm implementations. In the first stage, a large language model with research capabilities identifies recently published algorithms satisfying explicit experimental criteria. In the second stage, Claude Code is given a prompt to reproduce the reported baseline and then iterate an improvement process. We apply this pipeline to published algorithm implementations spanning multiple research domains. Claude Code reported that all eleven experiments yielded improvements. Each improvement could be achieved within a single working day. We analyse the human contributions that remain indispensable, including selecting the target, verifying experimental validity, assessing novelty and impact, providing computational resources, and writing with appropriate AI-use disclosure. Finally, we discuss implications for peer review and academic publishing. |
| title | Applying an Agentic Coding Tool for Improving Published Algorithm Implementations |
| topic | Software Engineering Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13109 |