Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13251 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910130091589632 |
|---|---|
| author | Berloff, Sofia Koptev, Pavel Malkov, Konstantin |
| author_facet | Berloff, Sofia Koptev, Pavel Malkov, Konstantin |
| contents | Analog optical computers promise large efficiency gains for machine learning inference, yet no demonstration has moved beyond small-scale image benchmarks. We benchmark the analog optical computer (AOC) digital twin on mortgage approval classification from 5.84 million U.S. HMDA records and separate three sources of accuracy loss. On the original 19 features, the AOC reaches 94.6% balanced accuracy with 5,126 parameters (1,024 optical), compared with 97.9% for XGBoost; the 3.3 percentage-point gap narrows by only 0.5pp when the optical core is widened from 16 to 48 channels, suggesting an architectural rather than hardware limitation. Restricting all models to a shared 127-bit binary encoding drops every model to 89.4--89.6%, with an encoding cost of 8pp for digital models and 5pp for the AOC. Seven calibrated hardware non-idealities impose no measurable penalty. The three resulting layers of limitation (encoding, architecture, hardware fidelity) locate where accuracy is lost and what to improve next. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_13251 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Analog Optical Inference on Million-Record Mortgage Data Berloff, Sofia Koptev, Pavel Malkov, Konstantin Machine Learning Emerging Technologies Neural and Evolutionary Computing Analog optical computers promise large efficiency gains for machine learning inference, yet no demonstration has moved beyond small-scale image benchmarks. We benchmark the analog optical computer (AOC) digital twin on mortgage approval classification from 5.84 million U.S. HMDA records and separate three sources of accuracy loss. On the original 19 features, the AOC reaches 94.6% balanced accuracy with 5,126 parameters (1,024 optical), compared with 97.9% for XGBoost; the 3.3 percentage-point gap narrows by only 0.5pp when the optical core is widened from 16 to 48 channels, suggesting an architectural rather than hardware limitation. Restricting all models to a shared 127-bit binary encoding drops every model to 89.4--89.6%, with an encoding cost of 8pp for digital models and 5pp for the AOC. Seven calibrated hardware non-idealities impose no measurable penalty. The three resulting layers of limitation (encoding, architecture, hardware fidelity) locate where accuracy is lost and what to improve next. |
| title | Analog Optical Inference on Million-Record Mortgage Data |
| topic | Machine Learning Emerging Technologies Neural and Evolutionary Computing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13251 |