Cover Image

PeerPrism: Peer Evaluation Expertise vs Review-writing AI

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Sadeghian, Soroush, Daqiq, Alireza, Cheraghi, Radin, Ebrahimi, Sajad, Arabzadeh, Negar, Bagheri, Ebrahim
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Computation and Language
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Peerispect: Claim Verification in Scientific Peer Reviews
by: Ghorbanpour, Ali, et al.
Published: (2026)

PeeriScope: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Evaluating Peer Review Quality
by: Ebrahimi, Sajad, et al.
Published: (2026)

exHarmony: Authorship and Citations for Benchmarking the Reviewer Assignment Problem
by: Ebrahimi, Sajad, et al.
Published: (2025)

QueryGym: A Toolkit for Reproducible LLM-Based Query Reformulation
by: Bigdeli, Amin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Adversarial Attacks against Neural Ranking Models via In-Context Learning
by: Bigdeli, Amin, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Reproducibility Study of LLM-Based Query Reformulation
by: Bigdeli, Amin, et al.
Published: (2026)

ReFormeR: Learning and Applying Explicit Query Reformulation Patterns
by: Bigdeli, Amin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models
by: Razavi, Amirhossein, et al.
Published: (2025)

RATE: Reviewer Profiling and Annotation-free Training for Expertise Ranking in Peer Review Systems
by: Liu, Weicong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
by: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Human-AI Comparative Analysis of Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-Based Relevance Judgment
by: Arabzadeh, Negar, et al.
Published: (2025)

Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews
by: Lu, Sheng, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can QPP Choose the Right Query Variant? Evaluating Query Variant Selection for RAG Pipelines
by: Arabzadeh, Negar, et al.
Published: (2026)

Benchmarking LLM-based Relevance Judgment Methods
by: Arabzadeh, Negar, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?
by: Church, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2024)

PRAIB: Peer Review AI Benchmark of Behaviour of LLM-Assisted Reviewing
by: Żurawicki, Krzysztof, et al.
Published: (2026)

PRISM: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Peer Reviewers
by: Loc, Ngoc Phan Phuoc, et al.
Published: (2026)

Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity
by: Sahakyan, Maria, et al.
Published: (2025)

Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review
by: Lin, Zhicheng
Published: (2025)

PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews
by: Baumgärtner, Tim, et al.
Published: (2025)

Sem-Detect: Semantic Level Detection of AI Generated Peer-Reviews
by: Duarte, André V., et al.
Published: (2026)

AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents
by: Jin, Yiqiao, et al.
Published: (2024)

PRE: A Peer Review Based Large Language Model Evaluator
by: Chu, Zhumin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2024)

Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis
by: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)

Detecting AI-Generated Content in Academic Peer Reviews
by: Shen, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

WarrantScore: Modeling Warrants between Claims and Evidence for Substantiation Evaluation in Peer Reviews
by: Mori, Kiyotada, et al.
Published: (2026)

Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation Evaluation
by: Chen, Junjie, et al.
Published: (2024)

ReviewScore: Misinformed Peer Review Detection with Large Language Models
by: Ryu, Hyun, et al.
Published: (2025)

The New Social Image: How AI Competency and AI Proactivity Influence Self- and Peer-Perceptions in the Workplace
by: Ghosh, Kuntal, et al.
Published: (2026)

Led to Mislead: Adversarial Content Injection for Attacks on Neural Ranking Models
by: Bigdeli, Amin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Reviewing the Reviewer: Elevating Peer Review Quality through LLM-Guided Feedback
by: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Published: (2026)

ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review
by: Sahu, Gaurav, et al.
Published: (2025)

Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review
by: Zhou, Li, et al.
Published: (2025)

What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?
by: Kuznetsov, Ilia, et al.
Published: (2024)

AgentPeerTalk: Empowering Students through Agentic-AI-Driven Discernment of Bullying and Joking in Peer Interactions in Schools
by: Paul, Aditya, et al.
Published: (2024)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time
by: Kuznetsov, Ilia, et al.
Published: (2026)

LazyReview A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews
by: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Published: (2025)